- Gebundene Ausgabe: 304 Seiten
- Verlag: Harper (10. Mai 2005)
- Sprache: Englisch
- ISBN-10: 0060779683
- ISBN-13: 978-0060779689
- Größe und/oder Gewicht: 18,9 x 13,3 x 2,8 cm
- Durchschnittliche Kundenbewertung: 3 Kundenrezensionen
- Amazon Bestseller-Rang: Nr. 457.311 in Fremdsprachige Bücher (Siehe Top 100 in Fremdsprachige Bücher)
How to Be Idle (Englisch) Gebundene Ausgabe – 10. Mai 2005
Kunden, die diesen Artikel gekauft haben, kauften auch
Es wird kein Kindle Gerät benötigt. Laden Sie eine der kostenlosen Kindle Apps herunter und beginnen Sie, Kindle-Bücher auf Ihrem Smartphone, Tablet und Computer zu lesen.
Geben Sie Ihre E-Mail-Adresse oder Mobiltelefonnummer ein, um die kostenfreie App zu beziehen.
Mehr über den Autor
“In these stress-filled times . . . we should all give ourselves the gift of reading this debut.” (Library Journal)
“A true literary gem... irresistable” (USA Today)
As Oscar Wilde said, doing nothing is hard work. The Protestant work ethic has most of us in its thrall, and the idlers of this world have the odds stacked against them. But here, at last, is a book that can help. From Tom Hodgkinson, editor of the Idler, comes HOW TO BE IDLE, an antidote to the work-obsessed culture which puts so many obstacles between ourselves and our dreams. Hodgkinson presents us with a laid-back argument for a new contract between routine and chaos, an argument for experiencing life to the full and living in the moment. Ranging across a host of issues that may affect the modern idler sleep, the world of work, pleasure and hedonism, relationships, bohemian living, revolution he draws on the writings of such well-known apologists for idleness as Dr Johnson, Oscar Wilde, Robert Louis Stevenson and Nietzsche. His message is clear: take control of your life and reclaim your right to be idle. -- Dieser Text bezieht sich auf eine andere Ausgabe: Taschenbuch.Alle Produktbeschreibungen
Welche anderen Artikel kaufen Kunden, nachdem sie diesen Artikel angesehen haben?
In diesem Buch(Mehr dazu)
I wonder if that hard-working American rationalist and agent of industry Benjamin Franklin knew how much misery he would cause in the world when, back in 1757, high on puritanical zeal, he popularized and promoted the trite and patently untrue aphorism "early to bed and early to rise, makes a man healthy, wealthy and wise"? Lesen Sie die erste Seite
Buchdeckel | Copyright | Inhaltsverzeichnis | Auszug | Rückseite
Das Buch ist sehr gut geschrieben und gehört zu der Art von Büchern bei der man anfängt zu lesen und ein paar Stunden später feststellt, dass man noch etwas anderes vorhatte.
Ich schließe ab mit einem Zitat aus dem Buch, dass den Geist des Buches auch ganz gut beschreibt.
"Let us be lazy in everything, except in loving and drinking, except in beeing lazy" - Lessing
Der Titel lässt leider nicht auf den Inhalt schließen.
Im Prinzip wird sehr langatmig der Alltag eines Beaus um die Jahrhundertwende des 20ten Jahrhunderts beschrieben.
Da empfehle ich dann doch eher einen Roman aus dieser Epoche......
Kurzum, das Buch ist langatmig, langweilig und nicht besonders geschrieben.
Positiv: Nach 10-20 Seiten ist man entschlummert und mit hin "idle"
Die hilfreichsten Kundenrezensionen auf Amazon.com (beta)
I wish there were more books like this.
So "How To Be Idle" offers a vast store of information, and handily merits a 5-star rating. Normally I'm content to just borrow a book from the library and return it, but this one I gladly purchased. I recommend it as a keeper to anyone wishing to enlighten themselves and/or shed the guilt sometimes associated with idleness.
You could criticize How To Be Idle as impractical and for not really providing a means to drop out. Hodgkinson, for example, breezily talks about staying home from work, even quitting your job, but how many people can really do this? Yet a book like this helps us to take the first step, which is asking some basic questions about our supposedly free and prosperous society. Most people today are on a never-ending treadmill, in which the bulk of their time is spent sustaining a life that is controlled by others.
I enjoyed the whole book, but I especially appreciated the last few chapters. Hodgkinson reveals his truly radical vision when he discusses holidays, and how the whole concept is really part of the wage-slave mentality. First of all, people are encouraged to be constantly busy on holiday, which, he points out, defeats the whole purpose. More fundamentally, we have become conditioned to having our freedom doled out to us by leaders, whether of state or corporation. So we are allowed a holiday now and then in order to make us more amenable to our captivity the rest of the time. What this book is really saying is that it is up to us to take back our time and freedom. I am in accord with Hodgkinson's desire to free us from these chains.
The book covers a 24-hour period with each hour represented in an essay that starts with a quote and a sketch depicting the chapter's topic. The author opens with "Waking up Is Hard to Do" at 8 a.m. and immediately attacks the quote many of us relate to when it comes to waking up — Benjamin Franklin's "Early to bed..." philosophy. Hodgkinson recalls his mother screaming at him to wake up and now he starts his mornings as an idler by "sleeping in for a few more minutes."
In the first hour, he attacks Mr. Kellogg of Corn Flakes fame with humor, and explains that the assault against oversleeping started as far back as biblical times with a quote from Proverbs chapter six. Then Hodgkinson presents proponents of sloth like G.K. Chesterston who writes in his essay _On Lying in Bed_, "The tone now commonly taken towards the practice of lying in bed is hypocritical and unhealthy; instead of being regarded as it ought to be, as a matter of personal."
The hours that follow continue with the same approach while addressing different themes from 'sleeping in' to the hangover, to the art of the conversation and holidays. Every essay includes quotes and resources from the likes of Jerome K. Jerome, Winston Churchill, Samuel Taylor Coleridge, and more to rally support for the idle life. Each hour stands on its own feet, so you can take your time and read them whenever.
This author doesn't give advice on organizing your time so you can relax and take pleasure in life. Rather, think of it as the side of a debate that urges we sleep in, take naps, make time for tea, hang out at the pub, and live in our dream world. The author addresses the issues that affect the idler's life and tells the reader how to continue the merry idle way in spite of these barriers. Even some of the smartest minds in history did their best work in bed.
Stories about inventor Thomas Edison, the enemy of idleness, say he slept only three or four hours a night because he liked to work at night and do his experiments during the day. It turns out, based on several witnesses; the inventor took naps in his lab.
The book needs an index, but perhaps the author convinced his editors to take it easy, so they skipped it. With the many references to people and quotes, it would be nice to find something I read without working that hard to scan the pages.
The book is a mixture of literary criticism, tongue-in-cheek wit, and insight into our society's neglect of the idle life. Readers desiring to become more familiar with the literary authors and other sages get a touch of these folks through their writings, comments, and actions on work and laziness. Hodgkinson writes a convincing manifesto for living easy and embellishes it with a diversity of classic resources.
Take a moment to relish your life; work can wait.
Indulging in Romantic visions of the past, Hodgkinson says that the poor were happier in the pre-industrial age, when work was not dictated by the clock, when people could multi-task and, if they wanted to, take time off to be idle. Holidays would appear to be good for idling, and Hodgkinson has an interesting chapter on their history. There are holidays of which he approves and holidays (especially organized ones) of which he disapproves. Best of all, of course, would be a life which allows so much opportunity for idling that there is really no desire for holidays at all. For those who are tied to the daily grind he has a chapter extolling skiving off work: the skiver is simply "stealing back time that has been stolen from him." "A four-hour [working] day is an eminently sensible way of operating our lives". He approves of long lie-ins, of napping, above all of long siestas. You should never stint yourself of sleep; and in dozing and in dreams some people have their most creative ideas. He advocates drinking (and don't worry too much about hangovers the next day - the best treatment for them is to go to bed), smoking and the taking of drugs like Ecstasy.
For Hodgkinson, idling is not only good in itself, but is also implicitly a rebellion against a society that demands unrelenting, soulless and exploited work from us. When the rebellion becomes explicit, as it does in strikes (the idea of using a refusal to work as a weapon was surely invented by "an idler of genius") or even in riots, he is sympathetic to such protests. But he is not a socialist: socialists interfere too much in the lives of individuals. "The answer, perhaps, is in anarchism."
What would be the ideal idler's sex-life? "Sex for idlers should be messy, drunken, bawdy, lazy. It should be wicked, wanton and lewd, dirty to the point where it is embarrassing to look at one another in the morning." "But, as one of the great idle pleasures, sex appears to be surrounded by an awful lot of problems and anxieties". So there is something to be said for pornography: "endless fantasy and no one to please except yourself."
Hodgkinson has read widely and has been far from idle in finding quotations from a host of writers from many countries and many periods, in prose and in poetry, who share his opinions: his bibliography runs to eight pages. In addition to references in the main text, there are 37 pages in which he gives us eight longer extracts from his reading. His own book is very well written and eloquent.
His analysis of the ills of our unhealthy rat-race society is astute. Some of his prescriptions about how to live in it are quite workable; but others are wholly unrealistic for people less fortunately placed than he is, even if these agreed with his analysis and would like to rebel in the ways he advocates.
There are many flashes of wisdom in the book, but he also includes in his defence of idleness some aspects and attitudes which did not appeal to me at all.