One thing this book is NOT is a "historical atlas of India". In 64 pages there are 18 maps -- of these, 3 are of modern India (physical and political), two are of the empire of Alexander (for some unaccountable reason, modern Jordan is marked on one of these maps, as is Medina, which I thought did not exist in those times), one of the spread of Islam up to 750AD(? I thought we were dealing with India?),4 are reprints of old maps of Asia (with no very useful political or other details marked out within the India they show), and one is a "map" (ie plan) of a Portugese trading post(no discernible connection to the text. That leaves 7 maps, 3 of which again are reprints of old British maps of India,not serving any purpose of advancing ones knowledge of the evolution of a united country under the British. A historical atlas should use maps (based on up-to-date research)to show how large-scale forces moved across the landscape as it was shaped into what we know now(eg powerful dynasties, the Black Death or a religion). On that score, this is not a historical atlas. I do not know who the text is pitched at, but it is extremely simplistic -- as it is rather large print I guess kids (WHICH kids, don't ask me).Finally, I note that the page on further reading does not see fit to mention Nehru's "Discovery of India", especially given that Nehru was one of the real founding fathers of modern India, and had a deep understanding of its history.