Food Politics und über 1 Million weitere Bücher verfügbar für Amazon Kindle . Erfahren Sie mehr

Möchten Sie verkaufen? Hier verkaufen
Food Politics: How the Food Industry Influences Nutrition and Health (California Studies in Food and Culture)
 
 
Beginnen Sie mit dem Lesen von Food Politics auf Ihrem Kindle in weniger als einer Minute.

Sie haben keinen Kindle? Hier kaufen oder eine gratis Kindle Lese-App herunterladen.

Food Politics: How the Food Industry Influences Nutrition and Health (California Studies in Food and Culture) [Englisch] [Gebundene Ausgabe]

Marion Nestle
1.0 von 5 Sternen  Alle Rezensionen anzeigen (1 Kundenrezension)

Erhältlich bei diesen Anbietern.


Weitere Ausgaben

Amazon-Preis Neu ab Gebraucht ab
Kindle Edition EUR 17,26  
Gebundene Ausgabe --  
Taschenbuch EUR 30,98  

Produktinformation

  • Gebundene Ausgabe: 469 Seiten
  • Verlag: University of California Press (4. März 2002)
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • ISBN-10: 0520224655
  • ISBN-13: 978-0520224650
  • Größe und/oder Gewicht: 22,9 x 15,2 x 3,3 cm
  • Durchschnittliche Kundenbewertung: 1.0 von 5 Sternen  Alle Rezensionen anzeigen (1 Kundenrezension)
  • Amazon Bestseller-Rang: Nr. 1.629.703 in Englische Bücher (Siehe Top 100 in Englische Bücher)
  • Komplettes Inhaltsverzeichnis ansehen

Mehr über den Autor

Marion Nestle
Entdecken Sie Bücher, lesen Sie über Autoren und mehr

Besuchen Sie die Seite von Marion Nestle auf Amazon

Produktbeschreibungen

Amazon.com

In the U.S., we're bombarded with nutritional advice--the work, we assume, of reliable authorities with our best interests at heart. Far from it, says Marion Nestle, whose Food Politics absorbingly details how the food industry--through lobbying, advertising, and the co-opting of experts--influences our dietary choices to our detriment. Central to her argument is the American "paradox of plenty," the recognition that our food abundance (we've enough calories to meet every citizen's needs twice over) leads profit-fixated food producers to do everything possible to broaden their market portion, thus swaying us to eat more when we should do the opposite. The result is compromised health: epidemic obesity to start, and increased vulnerability to heart and lung disease, cancer, and stroke--reversible if the constantly suppressed "eat less, move more" message that most nutritionists shout could be heard.

Nestle, nutrition chair at New York University and editor of the 1988 Surgeon General Report, has served her time in the dietary trenches and is ideally suited to revealing how government nutritional advice is watered down when a message might threaten industry sales. (Her report on byzantine nutritional food-pyramid rewordings to avoid "eat less" recommendations is both predictable and astonishing.) She has other "war stories," too, that involve marketing to children in school (in the form of soft-drink "pouring rights" agreements, hallway advertising, and fast-food coupon giveaways), and diet-supplement dramas in which manufacturers and the government enter regulation frays, with the industry championing "free choice" even as that position counters consumer protection. Is there hope? "If we want to encourage people to eat better diets," says Nestle, "we need to target societal means to counter food industry lobbying and marketing practices as well as the education of individuals." It's a telling conclusion in an engrossing and masterfully panoramic exposé. --Arthur Boehm

From Booklist

For decades, the American food industry struggled to provide enough sustenance to keep Americans alive and healthy. By the end of the twentieth century, they had succeeded in producing and distributing not only more than enough to feed Americans, but enough to turn America into the world's breadbasket. Their success should be a cause for rejoicing, but at the beginning of the twenty-first century, success appears to be turning to tragedy. Americans die from eating too much food and the wrong kinds of it. The food industry, blinded to any concerns beyond short-term profits, preys on its customers with advertising, corrupts the political process, and manipulates the very nature of what people desire to eat. Nestle has thoroughly and carefully documented the food industry's unholy influence over public- health policy. Many people's lives and livelihoods are at stake in the conflict Nestle illuminates, and it will take scientific knowledge, political wisdom and leadership, enlightened and ethical corporate management, and consumer education to produce a positive outcome. Mark Knoblauch
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved


In diesem Buch (Mehr dazu)
Einleitungssatz
THE U.S. GOVERNMENT HAS BEEN TELLING PEOPLE WHAT TO eat for more than a century, and the history of such advice reflects changes in agriculture, food product development, and international trade, as well as in science and medicine. Lesen Sie die erste Seite
Mehr entdecken
Wortanzeiger
Ausgewählte Seiten ansehen
Buchdeckel | Copyright | Inhaltsverzeichnis | Auszug | Stichwortverzeichnis | Rückseite
Hier reinlesen und suchen:

Tags

 (Was ist das?)
Bei einem Tag handelt es sich um ein Schlagwort, das zum Produkt passt.
Tags erleichtern allen Kunden die Suche und die Sortierung ihrer Lieblingsprodukte.
 

Kundenrezensionen

5 Sterne
0
4 Sterne
0
3 Sterne
0
2 Sterne
0
Die hilfreichsten Kundenrezensionen
5 von 11 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
Von Ein Kunde
Format:Gebundene Ausgabe
Frau Prof. Nestle macht es sich in ihrem Buch zu einfach. Sie ortet einzig die Lebensmittelindustrie als Ursache für die Übergewichtsproblematik in der westlichen Welt. Nur deren Profitgier und Skrupellosigkeit - so ihre Meinung - hat uns zu "Couch-Potatoes" gemacht.

Dieser engstirnige Ansatz ist besonders für eine Wissenschaftlerin überraschend, da sich die Fachrichtungen, die sich mit dem Thema Übergewicht befassen, einig sind, dass Übergewicht ein multifaktorielles Problem ist. Das bedeutet, dass natürlich das, was wir essen, eine wichtige Rolle spielt, aber das auch andere Faktoren einen entscheidenden Einfluss haben. Allen voran ist hier die zunehmend weniger werdende körperliche Bewegung zu nennen, die die Gleichung Kalorienaufnahme weniger Kalorienverbrauch - selbst bei gleichbleibender Aufnahme - negativ beeinflusst.

Die Lösungsansätze in diesem Buch - sofern man überhaupt welche finden kann - greifen daher viel zu kurz und tragen den sogenannten Lifestyle-Faktoren und vor allem auch einer notwendigen und geforderten Verantwortung des Einzelnen kaum Rechnung. Dies ist wahrscheinlich auch ein Resultat der US-Lastigkeit des Buches.

Kurzum: lange Stories, wenig Essenz, nicht zu Ende gedacht.

War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich?
Die hilfreichsten Kundenrezensionen auf Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com:  52 Rezensionen
673 von 704 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
The PR campaign against this book has already begun 27. Februar 2002
Von Sheldon M. Rampton - Veröffentlicht auf Amazon.com
Format:Gebundene Ausgabe
For what it's worth, potential readers of Nestle's book should note that the first three "reader reviews" of this book are pretty obviously cranked out by some food industry PR campaign. To begin with, they were all submitted on the same date, February 22 -- "reader reviews" of a book that isn't even scheduled to go on sale until March 4! For another thing, they all hit on the same food industry "message points": that critics are "nagging nannies" whipping up "hysteria" on behalf of "greedy trial lawyers," etc. February 22 is also the date that noted industry flack Steven Milloy of the "Junk Science Home Page" (...) wrote a review trashing Nestle's book. Milloy is a former tobacco lobbyist and front man for a group created by Philip Morris, which has been diversifying its tobacco holdings in recent years by buying up companies that make many of the fatty, sugar-laden foods that Nestle is warning about. (...)

I haven't even had a chance yet to read Nestle's book myself, but it irritates me to see the food industry's PR machine spew out the usual (...) every time someone writes something they don't like. If they hate her this much, it's probably a pretty good book.

146 von 151 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
The food industry's assault on your health 26. Dezember 2002
Von Malvin - Veröffentlicht auf Amazon.com
Format:Gebundene Ausgabe|Von Amazon bestätigter Kauf
Nutrition expert Marion Nestle's "Food Politics" explains how the formula for a healthy diet hasn't changed. She advises that one should eat more plant-based foods (fruits, vegetables and whole grains) and less meat, dairy and sweets. But this message collides with the interests of the food-industrial complex, which makes the bulk of its profits by selling relatively expensive processed foods. The book examines how corporations have successfully fought the health message by using a number of overt and covert tactics to further their objectives at the public's expense.

In fact, this business success story has resulted in a generation of Americans who are significantly overweight compared with their predecessors. Nestle shows that public relations and government lobbying result in obfuscation and mixed messages about the relative values of certain foods; this generally confuses Americans and makes it difficult to get the "eat less" message. Interestingly, she reveals that the amount of sweets and snack foods consumed are in almost exact proportion to the advertising dollars spent promoting these foods, suggesting that limits on advertising junk food to children might be a reasonable first step in addressing this problem.

But Nestle is particularly critical of the criminally poor quality of the nation's public school lunch program and the "pouring rights" contracts struck with soft drink companies by cash-starved school districts. Our country's apparent unwilingness to provide nutritious meals to our schoolchildren is shameful, and Nestle should be congratulated for bringing the situation to light.

Other noteworthy sections of the book address the deregulation of dietary supplements and the invention of "techno-foods", ie foods that have been fortified with vitamins, minerals or herbal ingredients. The overall picture is one of regulators on the defensive and huckster capitalism run rampant. While it was disturbing but not too surprising to learn about relatively obscure supplement makers making absurd claims for products that have little scientifically proven value, it was somewhat amusing to see a reprint of a short-lived advertisement for Heinz ketchup that promoted its supposed cancer-fighting properties. It appears there are no limits to what kinds of food products might be similarly reinvented by marketers in their quest for higher profits.

In the closing chapter, Nestle proposes a number of useful solutions. Her ideas are reasonable and display a maturity gained through many years spent in government and academia. In an environment where food choices and information surrounding food products are increasingly difficult to understand, let's hope that this book inspires us all to demand greater accountability from the food companies that feed us. Highly recommended!

116 von 120 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
An Important Read in a Lackluster Format 15. Juni 2005
Von K. Pierre-Louis - Veröffentlicht auf Amazon.com
Format:Taschenbuch
Here's the thing.

As one reviewer mentioned I think the bulk of negative reviewers have not actually read this book.

The author is a nuritionist, who says that despite the really basic nutritional advice of most nutritionists which has not significantly changed over the course of a half century, the public still views nutritional advice as difficult to understand.

Why?

Because the food industry makes more money when it sells more products. It has a vested interest in getting people to at least buy (if not eat) more food. Most importantly, the least healthy foods (i.e. highly processed foods) have the highest profit margins. To ensure profits, they pressure the government to avoid informing the public in an easily understandable format that they should eat less and avoid processed foods.

Is she saying this is the ONLY reason why americans are fat? No. But the fact that many, many, many americans have problems figuring out what the heck to eat is heavily due to the food lobbyists, a fact which she goes into in nauseating detail.

And therein lies the problem.

Nestle is an Academic and she writes like one. Anyone familiar with non-fiction in the style of Nickle and Dimed, Fast Food Nation, or even Island of the Colorblind will find Food Politics irritating. Not because the book is poorly written, per se, but because it's dull.

She obscures critical points between reams of facts, her narrative style plods along instead of floating or skipping, and I frequently felt like hurling the book across the room screaming get to the point already.

But I did finish the book.

Because the message is far more important then the limited medium. This book is critically important in that it hi-lights the sad reality that billions of dollars being spent vying for a place on the tip of your fork. Sadly very little of this money bears your health in mind.
Kundenrezensionen suchen
Nur in den Rezensionen zu diesem Produkt suchen

Kunden diskutieren

Das Forum zu diesem Produkt
Diskussion Antworten Jüngster Beitrag
Noch keine Diskussionen

Fragen stellen, Meinungen austauschen, Einblicke gewinnen
Neue Diskussion starten
Thema:
Erster Beitrag:
Eingabe des Log-ins
 


Aktive Diskussionen in ähnlichen Foren
Kundendiskussionen durchsuchen
Alle Amazon-Diskussionen durchsuchen
   
Ähnliche Foren


Lieblingslisten


Ähnliche Artikel finden


Anhand des Sachgebietes nach ähnlichen Produkten suchen:


Ihr Kommentar