Möchten Sie verkaufen? Hier verkaufen
Fateful Hoaxing of Margaret Mead: An Historical Analysis of Her Samoan Researches
 
Größeres Bild
 
Den Verlag informieren!
Ich möchte dieses Buch auf dem Kindle lesen.

Sie haben keinen Kindle? Hier kaufen oder eine gratis Kindle Lese-App herunterladen.

Fateful Hoaxing of Margaret Mead: An Historical Analysis of Her Samoan Researches [Englisch] [Taschenbuch]

Derek Freeman
2.7 von 5 Sternen  Alle Rezensionen anzeigen (3 Kundenrezensionen)

Erhältlich bei diesen Anbietern.


Weitere Ausgaben

Amazon-Preis Neu ab Gebraucht ab
Gebundene Ausgabe --  
Taschenbuch --  

Produktinformation

  • Taschenbuch: 304 Seiten
  • Verlag: Westview Pr; Auflage: New edition (7. Oktober 1999)
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • ISBN-10: 0813336937
  • ISBN-13: 978-0813336930
  • Größe und/oder Gewicht: 22,8 x 15,2 x 2 cm
  • Durchschnittliche Kundenbewertung: 2.7 von 5 Sternen  Alle Rezensionen anzeigen (3 Kundenrezensionen)
  • Amazon Bestseller-Rang: Nr. 1.177.025 in Englische Bücher (Siehe Top 100 in Englische Bücher)
  • Komplettes Inhaltsverzeichnis ansehen

Mehr über den Autor

Derek Freeman
Entdecken Sie Bücher, lesen Sie über Autoren und mehr

Besuchen Sie die Seite von Derek Freeman auf Amazon

Produktbeschreibungen

Amazon.com

Margaret Mead's 1928 Coming of Age in Samoa, a report of her anthropological study of adolescent girls and a triumph of cultural relativism, firmly established her as a guiding voice of anthropology. Her work was mostly unquestioned during her lifetime, but in 1983 anthropologist Derek Freeman released a critical review of her work, showing that her assertion that adolescence in Samoa is easier because of free sexuality (upon which she based her nurture-over-nature theories) is in conflict with the facts of Samoan life and even with her own field notes. He suffered insult and approbation from nearly every member of the scientific establishment, to whom Mead was a hero and a saint, but he has rejoined the fray, perhaps to finish it, with The Fateful Hoaxing of Margaret Mead.

This scholarly review examines all of the primary sources related to Mead's fieldwork and the important 1987 recanting of one of her informers. Forcefully written and carefully constructed, Freeman's book shows that Mead's stay in Samoa was too brief and too consumed with a much larger ethnographic project to have accumulated much data on adolescent sexuality. Her need to finish the project and her fervent belief in culturalism then led her to accept the joking references of her two closest informers about free sex as truth. Careful to make it clear that his focus is on Mead's science, Freeman shows that it is extremely unlikely that Mead deliberately falsified her report, simply that her preconceptions blinded her to inconvenient facts. Given the impressive evidence arrayed here, it's hard to see how Mead's work in Samoa can be now viewed as anything but a pretty fable. --Rob Lightner -- Dieser Text bezieht sich auf eine vergriffene oder nicht verfügbare Ausgabe dieses Titels.

From Booklist

Having wounded Mead's reputation in Margaret Mead and Samoa (1983), Freeman is back for the kill. Wasting little time answering his critics, dismissed as deluded devotees of anthropology's "Mother Goddess," the author now deals with Mead's correspondence, field notes, and the testimony of a native informant, one of the girls who Freeman insists hoaxed the gullible young anthropologist into thinking that Samoan adolescents practiced free love under the starry Polynesian skies. What Freeman really urges us to disabuse ourselves of is Mead's cultural determinism. In detailing her early training, her activities in Samoa, and the making of her work, Coming of Age in Samoa, into the cause celebre of anthropology, Freeman never lets us forget the supposedly consequential flaws of her ardent culturalism. But is this fixation on the much-admired Mead and her 70-year-old study solely about scientific errors and paradigms? Acquire Freeman's book, and let your patrons decide for themselves, but be aware of alternative choices that may balance this author's intellectual belligerence. Philip Herbst -- Dieser Text bezieht sich auf eine vergriffene oder nicht verfügbare Ausgabe dieses Titels.

Tags

 (Was ist das?)
Bei einem Tag handelt es sich um ein Schlagwort, das zum Produkt passt.
Tags erleichtern allen Kunden die Suche und die Sortierung ihrer Lieblingsprodukte.
 

Eine digitale Version dieses Buchs im Kindle-Shop verkaufen

Wenn Sie ein Verleger oder Autor sind und die digitalen Rechte an einem Buch haben, können Sie die digitale Version des Buchs in unserem Kindle-Shop verkaufen. Weitere Informationen

Kundenrezensionen

Die hilfreichsten Kundenrezensionen
3 von 3 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
Von Ein Kunde
Format:Gebundene Ausgabe
When her hosts in Manu'a learned that 'Makelita' had made them world famous as libertines, they were dismayed by what to them was an abominable slander. And they were dumbfounded that, after showing her the utmost hospitality and cooperation, she could have so grossly betrayed them. They hit on the explanation that someone among them fed her a line of bull (tala pepelo lava).

This was a generous if implausible explanation. Generous, because it avoided taxing her with outright fabrication. Implausible, because Mead's depiction of Samoan promiscuity drives whoredom into the core of the social psyche. She claimed that Samoans have no sense of sin despite their regular church attendance and the admonitions of pastors ('They are able to count [sex] at its true value. . . [they recognize] the essential impersonality of sex attraction which we may well envy them']. She reported masturbation, homosexuality, and lesbianism as common practices that were regarded as 'simply play' between casual heterosexual liaisons. In other words, Mead's Samoans, like Mead herself, were bisexual. She attributed the relaxed attitude to pre-marital sex and to adultery to the fact that Samoans have no deep attachments or strong emotional feelings. There is no parent-child bonding for the same reason. These and like claims construct the cultural 'pattern' of a society untroubled by the storm and stress of adolescence. Such thinking was the trendy utopianism of the sexual reformers of her era, but it had nothing to do with Samoa until Mead's arrival from New York.

Freeman's book is a mighty effort to convert the Samoan belief in duping into a well-founded conclusion. He touts two 'smoking guns'. One is the sworn testimony of Mead's dear friend during her field trip, Fa'apu'a Fa'amu, to the effect that she did indeed tell Mead fibs in reply to her questions about her relations with men. The other is correspondence between Mead and the supervisor of her Samoan research, Franz Boas.

The first smoking gun is a dud. Fa'amu testified only that she told Mead that 'We spend nights with boys, yes, with boys!' and similar non-specific allusions. There is no express admission that intercourse occurred. There is no hint whatever of lesbianism. The duping hypothesis predicts that Mead's field notes would record the information given her by Fa'amu. In fact, the notes never attribute any information to her. The natural conclusion is that despite the affection, Mead did not regard her friend as an informant. It is improbable, in any case, that Mead credited Fa'amu's tease, partly because her notes show that she was alert to tall tales and partly because Fa'amu's status as a taupou, or ceremonial virgin, meant that she was never unchaperoned and hence had no opportunity for 'spending nights with boys'. Finally, Fa'amu's non-specific allusions added nothing to what Mead's notes show she already believed she knew about Samoan promiscuity. In sum, the duping episode is irrelevant to understanding how Mead managed get Samoan moeurs so desperately wrong. Since the second smoking gun depends on the first, it too is a dud.

Did she make it up then? Although he repeatedly defends Mead's research integrity, Freeman destroys his noble defense by cataloguing deceit after deceit in things small and great. Mead indeed seems to have been a gamester who got a buzz from pulling the wool over people's eyes. And this was her reputation among her colleagues, who called her 'the lady novelist', a 'mythmaker', given to exaggeration and hyperbole, to sloppy and impressionistic description of no great reliability. The eminent Edward Sapir bluntly called her a 'pathological liar'.

Freeman shows that Mead's fieldwork was premised on two strategic deceits. She concealed from her hosts her married status. By passing herself off as a virgin, she was honored by three villages with title of taupou, which conferred a great advantage-she had, as she said, 'rank to burn' and could 'order people about'. She second strategic deceit was perpetrated on her supervisor, Franz Boas and indirectly on her funding sponsor, the National Research Council. Boas and the Council expected her to research the personality of adolescent girls, to determine the extent to which nature (puberty) or culture influenced adolescent conflict. But Mead wasn't interested in this project. She accepted it because it got he a ticket to the field. Her real interest was ethnography. Unbeknownst to Boas, Mead struck an agreement with the Bishop Museum (Honolulu) to prepare a monograph on Samoa. Freeman shows by a meticulous reconstruction of her activities that she spent no more than four or five weeks on the funded project, hardly time enough for a systematic investigation of this complex and demanding subject. This is confirmed by her sparse field notes on the adolescent project.

Her strategic impostures led to the massive fraud that made her famous. Having little data, she just made it up and pretended, in the appendices of Coming of Age, to have found it. Mead seems to have delighted in slipping mickies as a kind of sport. She says, for example, that Samoa was untroubled by natural disasters. Yet it's common knowledge that no island is spared the ravages of storm, flood and occasional tsunamis. In fact, a hurricane devastated Manu'a in January of the year of her visit. She says that Samoan children alternately crawl or walk until the age of 'three or four'. Every caregiver knows that once the child learns to walk, next it runs and never returns to crawling. She seems to have been supremely confident that no one would call her hand on such whoppers. Deception was so habitual that she lied gratuitously. Thus she told Boas that she was seasick for six weeks (!!) on her return voyage, while in fact she was romancing a new beau-love sick, not seasick. It's not surprising that her epistemological mottoes were: 'The truth isn't out there, you know' and 'If it isn't [true], it ought to be'.

Freeman's claim that the hoax 'effectively solve[s] the 'enigma of Margaret Mead's research' unfortunately follows the fashion of substituting victimhood for active will. He would have us see her as the unwitting pawn of a mythopoetic fate. Fiddlesticks! Mead's behavior in Manu'a was a disgrace to herself and to her profession. Such conduct had no logical relation to Boasian anthropology. It was entirely her doing. Having deceived her hosts, she disgraced the sacrosanct taupou title by having affairs. That too was her personal choice. She went on to invent a salacious bisexual Samoa as a preamble to the part of Coming of Age that made her famous--her advocacy of educational, family, and sexual reform in America.

Mead's research presents no enigma. She always went to the field to find what she wanted to find-an uplifting story to boost a current social reform. As for those 'primitives' who served as fodder, well, they were expendable in the great struggle to reform the world.

Hiram Caton Editor, The Samoa Reader: Anthropologists Take Stock. University Press of America, 1990.

War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich?
1 von 2 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
The Hoax Muddle 29. Mai 2000
Von Ein Kunde
Format:Taschenbuch
This is a very readable book. Freeman has combed the sources and put together the 'biography' of Margaret Mead's first field trip. The story's all about how Mead got Samoa so wrong. He says that he was 'totally mystified' by it. What's the problem? Didn't Mead just grab the tropical island paradise yarn off the shelf, add her personal touch, and use it to draw liberating lessons for sexually up-tight America? That's the conclusion I draw from his own story, because he shows that she got the template of the legend from John Handy on her stop in Honolulu, and that her field notes contain very little information about the girls she described in detail in her book. So she must have made it up. According to Freeman, that's not right. He says that Mead's companions told her fibs one evening around the campfire. What did they tell her? He's pretty closed-mouth on this one. As best I can tell, they only said that they secretly slept around. So what? Freeman admits that she'd already heard that from other informants. What's so special about it? He goes into a very complicated speculations about Mead's thought processes to reach his conclusion that what the girls told him was a hoax. He seems to be saying that the fibs gave Mead the 'pattern' of recreational sex that she needed to make her supervisor happy. But didn't she already have the pattern from Handy? Why not argue that she was hoaxed by Handy before she ever set foot in Samoa. Besides, isn't the real issue where she got the information she used to fill in the lines between the dots? I tested this question by assuming that what the girls told her around the camp fire was true. You're still left with a huge information gap that Mead closed somehow. It wasn't just information about sex, but about rank, the intimate psychology of Samoans, and so on. The girls didn't give her any information about these things. So it's a bogus explanation. The hoax idea gets completely out of hand when Freeman uses it to explain Mead's book as the core of anthropology's belief system. He seems to be saying that Mead passed on the hoax to anthropology and to generations of Americans! This isn't even in the right ball park as an explanation of Mead's influence.
War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich?
0 von 4 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
Von John
Format:Taschenbuch
The author is a bully. He attempts to bully the reader by totally unscholarly failure to consider alternative explanations and to present data contrary to his obsessional besmirching of Margaret Mead (NOT just attacking her first book).

Since his first book attacking COMING OF AGE IN SAMOA, Freeman has become obsessed with sex. How stormy adolescence in Samoa was was in 1925-26 the "problem" Mead was studying, but Freeman now only sees the existence of "free love" as Mead's focus (any reading of what Mead wrote shows how false this). Moreover, Freeman's always palpable misogyny has extended to fagbashing in this book.

Too bada that Vladimir Nabokov is not around to write about Freeman's obsession with the (ghost of) the young Margaret Mead -- and what he portrays as her evil father. . .
War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich?
Kundenrezensionen suchen
Nur in den Rezensionen zu diesem Produkt suchen

Kunden diskutieren

Das Forum zu diesem Produkt
Diskussion Antworten Jüngster Beitrag
Noch keine Diskussionen

Fragen stellen, Meinungen austauschen, Einblicke gewinnen
Neue Diskussion starten
Thema:
Erster Beitrag:
Eingabe des Log-ins
 


Aktive Diskussionen in ähnlichen Foren
Kundendiskussionen durchsuchen
Alle Amazon-Diskussionen durchsuchen
   
Ähnliche Foren


Lieblingslisten


Ähnliche Artikel finden


Anhand des Sachgebietes nach ähnlichen Produkten suchen:


Ihr Kommentar