The Experience of God und über 1,5 Millionen weitere Bücher verfügbar für Amazon Kindle. Erfahren Sie mehr
EUR 24,61
  • Alle Preisangaben inkl. MwSt.
Nur noch 4 auf Lager (mehr ist unterwegs).
Verkauf und Versand durch Amazon.
Geschenkverpackung verfügbar.
Menge:1
Experience of God ist in Ihrem Einkaufwagen hinzugefügt worden
Ihren Artikel jetzt
eintauschen und
EUR 0,10 Gutschein erhalten.
Möchten Sie verkaufen?
Zur Rückseite klappen Zur Vorderseite klappen
Anhören Wird wiedergegeben... Angehalten   Sie hören eine Probe der Audible-Audioausgabe.
Weitere Informationen
Alle 2 Bilder anzeigen

Experience of God (Englisch) Gebundene Ausgabe – 1. Oktober 2013


Alle 4 Formate und Ausgaben anzeigen Andere Formate und Ausgaben ausblenden
Amazon-Preis Neu ab Gebraucht ab
Kindle Edition
"Bitte wiederholen"
Gebundene Ausgabe
"Bitte wiederholen"
EUR 24,61
EUR 24,61 EUR 54,44
3 neu ab EUR 24,61 4 gebraucht ab EUR 54,44

Hinweise und Aktionen

  • Große Hörbuch-Sommeraktion: Entdecken Sie unsere bunte Auswahl an reduzierten Hörbüchern für den Sommer. Hier klicken.


Wird oft zusammen gekauft

Experience of God + Atheist Delusions: The Christian Revolution and Its Fashionable Enemies
Preis für beide: EUR 42,22

Die ausgewählten Artikel zusammen kaufen
Jeder kann Kindle Bücher lesen — selbst ohne ein Kindle-Gerät — mit der KOSTENFREIEN Kindle App für Smartphones, Tablets und Computer.



Produktinformation


Mehr über den Autor

Entdecken Sie Bücher, lesen Sie über Autoren und mehr

Produktbeschreibungen

Pressestimmen

"Hart ... recalls believers of all faiths to the best of their traditions, challenges unbelievers to examine their own metaphysical presuppositions, and does these with tremendous gusto... A necessary book."-Michael Robbins, Commonweal -- Michael Robbins Commonweal "David Hart can always be relied on to offer a perspective on Christian faith that is both profound and unexpected. In this masterpiece of quiet intellectual and spiritual passion, he magnificently sets the record straight as to what sort of God Christians believe in and why."-Rowan Williams, University of Cambridge -- Rowan Williams "Hart marshals powerful historical evidence and philosophical argument to suggest that atheists-if they want to attack the opposition's strongest case-badly need to up their game."-Oliver Burkeman, The Guardian -- Oliver Burkeman The Guardian "A thoroughly entertaining and engaging read. It's difficult to convey to those who are unacquainted with Hart's writing the sheer exuberance of his prose and the bite to his wit."-Ryan Marr, Catholic Books Review -- Ryan Marr Catholic Books Review "Stunning ... bracing and bold ... For provoking deep thought about the profoundest human questions, and for taking an intelligent stand in defense of faith ... Hart deserves the gratitude of a large and appreciative audience."-Damon Linker, The Week -- Damon Linker The Week "Bracing and eloquent ... fans of Hart's winsome prose will not be disappointed ... a fine work."-Edward T. Oakes, S.J., National Review -- Edward T. Oakes, S.J. National Review "David Hart's new book is nothing less than astounding. He is liberal, conservative, radical, theological, philosophical, and historical all at the same time - that is his genius. There is no American writing on religion as intelligently, bravely, and originally as Hart."-Conor Cunningham, University of Nottingham -- Conor Cunningham "David Bentley Hart's new book is a feast- stylish and substantial. Bringing together Sanskritic analyses of God's being with Latin and Greek and Arabic ones, this is a considerable achievement by one of the most distinctive voices in contemporary theology."-Paul J. Griffiths, Duke Divinity School -- Paul J. Griffiths "Writing at a high philosophical level with a sharp sense of humor, Hart argues for an ecumenical Theism. Devastatingly accurate, imaginative, and immensely readable, this is David Bentley Hart's best book"-Francesca Murphy, University of Notre Dame -- Francesca Murphy "Magnificent ... a book unlike anything done in recent times and one that only Hart could write."-Robert Louis Wilken -- Robert Louis Wilken "Impressive"-David Gibson, Religion News Service -- David Hibson Religion News Service "Hart is a phenomenally gifted thinker who recalls believers of all faiths to the best of their traditions, challenges unbelievers to examine their own metaphysical presuppositions, and does these with tremendous gusto... A necessary book."-Michael Robbins, Commonweal -- Michael Robbins Commonweal "Magnificent ... Massively learned and gorgeously written, The Experience of God should entirely transform contemporary debates concerning the validity of belief in the divine."-Mark Anthony Signorelli, University Bookman -- Mark Anthony Signorelli University Bookman "Creative and engaging ... a stunning and provocative achievement."-Kenneth Oakes, Reformation 21 -- Kenneth Oakes Reformation 21 'This hugely suggestive book is a lyrical paean to a vital, more capacious understanding of reality, ourselves and God: a timely and gripping invitation to wake up, see the regnant naturalism, and subvert its suffocating hegemony. The text is by turns elegant, curmudgeonly, witty, infuriating, incisive, nostalgic, rhapsodical, explosive, frequently bang on the money - and always stimulating.' -Philip McCosker, The Tablet -- Philip McCosker The Tablet

Über den Autor und weitere Mitwirkende

David Bentley Hart is an Eastern Orthodox scholar of religion, philosopher, writer, and cultural commentator.

Welche anderen Artikel kaufen Kunden, nachdem sie diesen Artikel angesehen haben?

Kundenrezensionen

Es gibt noch keine Kundenrezensionen auf Amazon.de
5 Sterne
4 Sterne
3 Sterne
2 Sterne
1 Sterne

Die hilfreichsten Kundenrezensionen auf Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: 56 Rezensionen
168 von 179 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
Rich, Readable, and Vintage Hart 20. September 2013
Von Derrick A. Peterson - Veröffentlicht auf Amazon.com
Format: Gebundene Ausgabe Verifizierter Kauf
My general preamble to Amazon reviews these days starts the same way: I have fallen out of the habit of writing reviews because I think to do a review properly takes the time and energy at this moment in my education I would prefer be spent reading. Nonetheless both the excellence of this book and what in my humble opinion is the poorness of another review, have momentarily called me back. It is of course anyone's right to give a one-star review to a book--even a book I love; in doing so however one would hope cogent reasons other than "I didn't understand it" or vague incriminations of association with a journal one apparently dislikes, would be more than forthcoming. Sadly, such was not the case. That said, I can assure you that my "five-star" rating is not merely serving as a countervalence to the one-star, it is my genuine opinion of the book that would have been given either way. But now that the throat-clearing is done, lets get down to business.

Long story short: if you have read Hart and enjoyed his learnedness and witticism in the past, buy this book. If you haven't read Hart but are intrigued: this, or Atheist Delusions, are the places to start. In short: buy this book. Read it, Enjoy it. Pop some popcorn and wait for the fireworks. There really is no second guessing (especially at the affordable price). I was initially expecting something of a sequel to Beauty of the Infinite (which I still consider my favorite of Hart's books, despite its difficulty) but really for those interested I would consider this more akin to Atheist Delusions than anything. Much like Hart taking great pleasures dismantling many of our august myths regarding Christian history, here Hart takes aim at much of the tosh that passes for "talk about God," in the modern arena--particularly in the "God debates" between Fundamentalists and New-Atheists of all sorts. If you were like me, and were confused by the description of the book (Sanskrit? Hinduism? What is going on?) Hart attempts to dismantle--in classical Hart style--all these poor imitations of the Almighty by marshaling the resources of the "Classical theistic traditions" (note the plural, Hart includes Judaism, Islam, several forms of Hinduism, and others alongside Christianity). Here Hart thus takes an interesting--and perhaps controversial, for those of us still riding the avalanche of trinitarian scholarship of the last thirty years--approach by noting many of the conceptual similarities between these traditions and their theological and philosophical attempts to come to a "rational" picture of God. Thus Hart explicitly marshals the language of Thomas (which I'm sure many will recognize from Rahner's criticism of it): "There is an old Scholastic distinction between religious treatises written 'De Deo Uno' [on the one God] and 'de Deo Trino' [on the Triune God]..between, that is, those that are 'about the One God' known to persons of various faiths and philosophies, and those that are about the 'Trinitarian God' of Christian doctrine. I want to distinguish in a similar way between, on the one hand, metaphysical or philosophical descriptions of God and, on the other, dogmatic or confessional descriptions, and confine myself to the former." (4)

In doing so, Hart opens with the wonderful line "this is either an extremely ambitious book, or an extremely unambitious book." Which is to to say the goal of the book is such: "My intention," says Hart, "is simply to offer a definition of the word 'God' or of its equivalents in other tongues, and to do so in fairly slavish obedience to the classical definitions of the divine found in the theological and philosophical schools of most of the major religious traditions." As such, Hart wants to clarify just what this "God" is that we should, or should not believe in. He organizes this task around three themes familiar to anyone who has read the subheading to the book: Being, Consciousness, Bliss. Which is to say, how these "moments" or "concepts" implicate, and are implicated by, God: (taking some limited examples from the chapters) our Being as contingency implying an Ultimate non-Contingent, our conscious orientations to the world presupposing in every mundane thought, act, and supposition a reference to the infinite, and indeed a saturation by it--or that the mind and reality should be compatible with each other at all, and (to those familiar with Hart's work on Gregory of Nyssa this will sound familiar) our "bliss" or the ecstatic moments of rapture and joy, our "stretching out" or epektasis into infinity. Thus Hart provides three basic reasons for these terms: 1.) They more or less adequately summarize three concepts by which classical theism represented God (here those with Trinitarian hesitation to Hart's "separation of Treatises" will be relieved to note Hart's extensive talk of the Cappadocians, Augustine, Maximus the Confessor, and Bonaventure's concept of God as Love in Trinitarian form, a la Beauty of the Infinite. Hart has not strayed from his roots) 2.) Represent how humankind's relationship to God can be summarized by concepts and 3.) These three "moments" represent that which, it seems to Hart (quite rightly, I think) cannot be "metaphysically accounted for" by assuming metaphysical naturalism (42-45).

Thus, following Beauty of the Infinite's discourse of the "beautiful rhetoric" of Theistic discourse's ability to "illuminate existence," there is here a limited apologetic purpose; Hart repeatedly affirms that he is not attempting to "prove" God, yet he also frequently repeats that authentic theology and apologetics have a fuzzy line, and that part of the task of unburdening us of idols and caricatures of God is also to bring forth the true power of the theistic tradition's actual "picture of God" (for lack of a better term) and how it represents a rationally, emotionally, and aesthetically robust "explanation" (again, for lack of a better term) of reality. This is, of course, not "God-of-the Gaps" here, where God appears in spaces allowed by the aporia of some natural mechanism: "All the classical theological arguments regarding the order of the world" in fact "assume just the opposite: that God's creative power can be seen in the rational coherence of nature as a perfect whole; that the universe was not simply a factitious product of a supreme intellect but the unfolding of the omnipresent divine wisdom or logos." (38)

It would be difficult to summarize further without simply spoiling the book, but I will end with a few anecdotal observations of my own. The first is that one of the great surprises of the book is its readability. Atheist Delusions was of course quite readable, but this book represents Hart at his most "purified" and understandable (contra another reviewer, in my opinion); he is of course classic Hart (thus there are still flourishes that will make one reach for the dictionary), but classic Hart, I might say, doing his best Chesterton impression. His lucidness here is uncanny, as his ability to calmly explain and lay out themes one may already have familiarity with. There are--at least there was for me--many "wow" moments when Hart shows you something you have been looking at but did not quite recognize you saw. This is also, in my opinion, Hart's funniest book, with Hart's typically penetrating observation producing (at least for me) some actual laugh-out-loud moments. There is for example (I won't ruin it) a particularly great moment where Hart is tearing into analytic theology by telling a brief story of a coffee-loving dolphin; or there are great one-liners like "I am enough of a romantic to believe that if something is worth being rude about, it it worth understanding as well." Other surprises abound. For example, Hart takes on analytic theology repeatedly (though he is quite respectful of those like Alvin Plantinga, he is almost palpably frustrated by others), and I for one was quite surprised with Hart's extensive engagement with evolutionary and cognitive science literature (some of Hart's book reads very similar to his friend Conor Cunningham's book Darwin's Pious Idea). These are fun new territories to watch Hart turn his immense talents and intellect toward. Further, if I had a complaint about Atheist Delusions it was that Hart, despite his obviously immense learning, is often coy about his sources. I do not doubt the veracity of his claims, but for those like myself who like to hunt down new avenues of reading, the sparse annotations and bibliography were irritating. Here, Hart does follow much the same formula, with very few endnotes trailing his oceans of prose. However he adds a wonderful (and surprisingly fun to read) "Bibliographic Postscript" which is a sort of annotated bibliography (343-350), but reads more like one is having coffee with Hart and he is giving his opinion on sources used, and others which should be read by those interested.

But enough of my review, go start reading. Get lost in Hart's beautiful prose and wonderful mind. Even if you end up disagreeing with everything he wrote, I think you will have at least left the encounter having learned quite a bit.
99 von 110 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
Great arguments, mixed delivery 9. Oktober 2013
Von North Dakota Reader - Veröffentlicht auf Amazon.com
Format: Gebundene Ausgabe Verifizierter Kauf
Well, this is a tough one for stars. On the one hand, the arguments are right on the mark. I especially like how Hart places the arguments of new atheists and creation scientists/fundamentalists within a shared world view that diminishes the whole idea of God to begin with -- call it materialist or naturalist, once you begin with those post-Enlightenment habits of seeing the world you've pretty much written a coherent notion of God out of the picture. And Hart is very good at pointing out the lumbering absurdities of such an approach. He's also very good at ripping through the just-so stories of evolutionary psychology (aka in an earlier guise, sociobiology). So on the merits of argument, he gets a very high score.

My problems with the book are really two: (1) It would be twice as good a book if it were half as long. Hart needs to learn some restraint. He's too besotted with his prose, trying to effect, I suppose, a tweedy Oxonian style that just gets tiresome for most contemporary American readers. I don't want to call it pretentious, but it is annoying how it calls attention to itself and gets in the way of the ideas. (2) More problematic for me is this undercurrent of what I can only call "anger" muddying his robust attacks on the new atheists. It's certainly true that they deserve to have their goofy illogic and ignorance unmasked and Hart does this with abandon. But his evident contempt for them takes on this unsettling character of boot-stomping that feels unpleasant, defensive, and ... well ... mean. It's either that or Hart is too fond of his own erudition -- an arrogance, probably better founded, that actually mimics that of the Dawkins, Dennett, Grayling crowd. But where their smugness is laughable, Hart's is more of a concern. I contrast Hart's approach with Terry Eagleton's Reason, Faith, and Revolution: Reflections on the God Debate (also from Yale and just 169 pages of core text compared to Hart's 332). While they don't cover exactly the same ground, they do overlap and complement each other. And Eagleton is much more fun to read precisely because he's clearly having the time of his life and invites the reader to laugh along with him at the inadvertent buffoonery of the new atheists. Hart doesn't mention Eagleton, which I found a little odd. Maybe he doesn't like his Marxism. Or maybe his (Eagleton's) Aristotelian & Aquinan roots are too redolent of that wonderful soul, Herbert McCabe.

I didn't know who Hart was when I ordered the book (the title and blurb were enough to grab me), but I got curious enough after reading to check and discovered he's involved with the First Things gang. I read that journal from time to time and it turns out to be the key to the rhetorical style of this book: a little fusty, a little too embroiled in a larger winner take all cultural struggle, a little too smug about being on the side of the angels, and very often spot on but with little joy for all that. Hart's punditry and commentary there is also a bit rambling and wordy, just like this book. If you wanted to save the time and the expense, I'd ask somebody for a photocopy of chapters one and two ("'God' is not a proper name" and "Pictures of the World" -- only 84 pages!) and buy Eagleton's.

Still, I know some folks like this kind of thing and I'm sure the book will be a treat for them, ungodly long paragraphs and all. Each to their own.
38 von 40 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
A welcome corrective on the definition of God 14. Oktober 2013
Von CalebES - Veröffentlicht auf Amazon.com
Format: Gebundene Ausgabe Verifizierter Kauf
With works like "The Beauty of the Infinite," David Bentley Hart has already established himself as one of the most talented metaphysicians and theologians alive today. The man is clearly a genius. But occasionally, he bothers to write books that provide a public service for those of us who aren't academics--namely, books that offer a corrective to modern misunderstandings about religion, history, philosophy, and theology ("Atheist Delusions" was one such book). And now, with the publication of "The Experience of God," Dr. Hart has delivered another much-needed antidote to modern misunderstandings of the "God question"--what is God?

There are lots of books attempting to "defend" or "refute" the existence of God, but strangely enough, not many books attempting to explain just what exactly the word "God" is supposed to mean. And those that do make such an attempt (at least the ones that I've seen) fall short in numerous ways. One such shortcoming seems to me to be the failure to grapple with the various religious traditions of the world, which is no easy task, but certainly one that is necessary for any thoughtful person who wants to have a coherent account of the traditional meaning of "God." In this magnificent work, Dr. Hart does exactly that, aptly citing some of the greatest religious thinkers to reveal what the word "God" has traditionally meant across philosophical and theological faith traditions.

Don't get me wrong. Hart is not here engaging in the sort of naïve pluralism that says that all religions are saying the same thing; he is aware that there are clear theological differences across religious traditions, and he is respectful of those differences. But nor is Hart a fundamentalist who is willing to simply ignore the religious experience and philosophical thought of the rest of the world. There is a clear harmony in the metaphysics of the word "God" across religious traditions and it is that which he is trying to elucidate.

I should point out that Hart is very good at anticipating objections to his approach in this book. For instance, early on, he counters the common charge that average religious people don't think about God philosophically the way Hart expounds in his book. This is a common objection from New Atheist types like Richard Dawkins and Sam Harris, who often accuse "sophisticated theologians" of altering the traditional view of God in order to make it more reasonable and appealing. But as Hart points out, "there is absolutely nothing novel about the language I use in this book; it is a faithful digest of the primary claims made about the nature of God in the traditions I have named above."

Furthermore, "this is an entirely irrelevant argument" since "it is always true, for any shared body of knowledge, that the principles and logic of the whole `system' are most fully known only to a few individuals who have gone to the trouble to study them." And Hart adds, this objection is not really true anyway. If one asks the average believer what he understands God to be, the answers will often be perfectly concordant with the metaphysical formulae: God is Spirit, incorporeal, not an object located somewhere in space, not subject to the limitations of time, etc.

This is a much needed corrective for modern fundamentalists and zealous atheists alike. Hart delivers a prodigious blow to both groups, and he does so with erudition and scholarly seriousness. A book like this is long overdue and I, for one, am glad that it was written by none other than David Bentley Hart.
36 von 40 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
Tough read, but compelling ideas 8. Januar 2014
Von Sunrise Susie - Veröffentlicht auf Amazon.com
Format: Kindle Edition Verifizierter Kauf
Not for the casual reader, into which category I belong. Hart writes like the academic he is. Wiki describes him as an "Eastern Orthodox theologian, philosopher, and cultural commentator." In the book, Hart takes on atheists (he basically thinks they're crazy for NOT believing in a God.) He is laser-focused on defining and arguing for the God he perceives, not on any tangential questions that are likely to arise for many readers. That's not necessarily a criticism, just know that's what you're going to get. If I understand Hart, he believes most people, and atheists in particular, define God in a ridiculously narrow way. Thus they are continually shooting down straw men. He believes God transcends all things and is all things and we must re-think what and where God is to find him.

I wish he would have written in a more straight-forward, simple way. I've read books on complex ideas and know it can be done. This one's a tough slough--long paragraphs and no subheads to help the reader categorize his ideas. Still, I found his beliefs and "proofs," those I could wrest from the writing anyway, provocative and compelling.
20 von 22 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
Thoughtful polemic 8. März 2014
Von Bradley Messenger - Veröffentlicht auf Amazon.com
Format: Kindle Edition Verifizierter Kauf
Based upon recent reviews from Mr. Linker and Mr. Douthat, this book by David Bentley Hart stands as a thunderous rebuttal to the cadre of New Atheists trying to tear down theism with a straw man "demiurge." The demiurge is anthropomorphic, responsible for explaining current gaps in the historical sciences, and leaving itself exposed to the long knives of scientific enquiry. People, especially Dawkins and co, call this being "God" but miss the point entirely.

As an atheist approaching this book, I'm receptive to the charge that I may "not get it," and that my understanding of God as defined by theists may be mistaken. Yet, I have read a fair amount of philosophy and can summarize most of the arguments found in the literature. Thus, it was not terribly original that Hart subscribes to Aquinas's Ground of Being argument, defends an objective idealist view of consciousness, and then does a marginally better job than Francis Collins of arguing for moral sentiments as evidence of an Absolute Good. This may not be the same as Swinburne's "bodiless person," but no reader should approach this book believing it carries novel arguments. Aquinas's views rely upon Aristotelian views of causation (including formal and final causes) that require further argument to apply to natural (as opposed to human) actions.

His argument from consciousness begins with the assertion that science can never penetrate the mind to understand an individual's subjective experience, so consciousness will always be unexplained by science. This leads to his objective idealist view that mind is the major feature of the universe and it is God's supernatural power that allows us to see from the mind to an objective reality. This argument inspired me to read more about idealism, which is an interesting tradition that dates back to Plato. I give the author great credit for sharing this perspective so well. It's seems a defensible interpretation, but it seems odd to me that consciousness is so rare in the universe if it's so important. Why do only humans and a certain percentage of animals have consciousness and there is so much matter/energy in the rest of universe. It doesn't refute his point, but I found his explanation of consciousness more possible than probable.

I found his discussion of morality and beauty less compelling. He is entirely dismissive of evolutionary psychology, in which human behavioral traits are at least partly derived from natural selection. He wants to focus on altruism and scoffs at the ideas of kin and reciprocal altruism, primarily by discussing those who contribute to global causes. The altruism he discusses barely touches upon our daily experiences or the actions of most people, which is understandable since daily experience affirms that altruism is largely reserved for family, friends, and neighbors. But explaining it does not really matter because Hart flatly asserts that those who pursue truth, beauty, and the good are already affirming God's existence unwittingly.

I'm glad to have read this book, even though I do not accept the author's conclusions. He is clearly well read, eloquent with the pen, and confident in his arguments. Believers cannot help but feel triumphant reading a book of this quality. As others have noted, however, his eloquence comes with a spoonful of bile. He is condescending and insulting whenever discussing materialism (or, as called today, physicalism). I would have appreciated greater civility when approaching his opponents.

From the God that Hart described, I can't understand the cause for heated rhetoric. This God gives us all the window to see into this imperfect world, sustains our every action, and let's all of us pursue truth, beauty, and good in our lives. It's not a God that clearly needs to be worshiped because it's not clear that this God has anything resembling human emotions or desires. It's not clear that this God should care that we believe in Him, and it's not clear that the person who pursues "truth" and "goodness" as an atheist are less successful than those who pursue it as a theist. Hart's God could be accepted without making a dimple in a person's life and his conclusions don't make the claims of angels, demons, resurrections, an afterlife, and miracles in Christianity more probable. Hart had a more modest goal than defending these claims, and I think he makes an interesting case for his interpretation of the divine.
Waren diese Rezensionen hilfreich? Wir wollen von Ihnen hören.