Euclid - The Creation of Mathematics [Englisch] [Gebundene Ausgabe]

He largely disregards smallscale battles amongst the superspecialists ("all modern translations of Elements are satisfactory"). He overturns the fashionable idea that the "Two Cultures" cannot communicate. (Rilke has things to say, perhaps not to Hilbert, but to the widely cultured mathematician, about Widerspruch!)

About the pre-Euclidean origins of mathematics, he overmodestly disclaims specialist knowledge. An example: his tracing of the earliest technical work on dodecahedrons and icosahedrons via pre-Euclideans such as Theaetetus (Plato's friend), and on up to the Group Theory work on isomorphisms of the 1990s A.D. is done well and surefootedly. Too bad his modesty barred him ("I leave that to the specialists") from analyzing the pre-history of Euclid's Book XII, the classical ancestor of our integral calculus. The fact is that he knows a great deal about Eudoxus (another friend of Plato's). Perhaps more detail in a Second Edition?

His work on the so-called Euclidean Algorithm (finding a greatest common factor) also contributes importantly. Its autobiographical flavor is reminiscent of that of Archimedes' in "Sand Reckoner". It allows him to stake out a clear and non-partisan position on the question "where is the algebra?" question, on which scholarly debates often produce more heat than light.

So multi-faceted a book, one could wish a fuller Index. But the cultural sweep is admirable throughout. TL Heath's 1933 report about the Cambridge undergraduate, so struck by Euclid ("a book to be read in bed or on a holiday") may have exaggerated, making him over into a Young Werther. But Artmann's charming and learned book really is hard to put down, even at vacationtime.

To Artmann's credit, his book disregards the smallscale disputes amongst superspecialists ("all modern translations of Elements are satisfactory"). He overturns the fashionable idea that the "Two Cultures" cannot communicate. So, Rilke has something to say -- perhaps not to Hilbert, but to the widely cultured mathematician, or to the general reader -- about Contradiction, or Widerspruch.

About the pre-Euclidean origins of mathematics in Greece, he overmodestly disclaims specialist knowledge. An example: he traces the earliest technical work on the dodecahedron and the icosahedron via pre-Euclideans such as Theaetetus (Plato's friend), and up to the highly abstract Group Theory work on isomorphisms of the 1990s A.D. -- and does this well and surefootedly. Too bad his modesty barred him ("I leave that to the specialists") from analyzing the pre-history of Euclid's Book XII, the classical ancestor of our integral calculus. The fact is that he knows a great deal about Eudoxus (another friend of Plato's). Perhaps more detail in a Second Edition?

His work on the so-called Euclidean Algorithm (finding a greatest common factor) is another valuable contribution. Its autobiographical flavor is reminiscent of Archimedes in "Sand Reckoner". It allows him to stake out a clear and non-partisan position on the "where is the algebra?" question, on which scholarly debates often produce more heat than light.

So multi-faceted a book, one could wish an Index fuller than a mere 2 pages. Typos are too frequent for a good house like Springer, including two I found in names of authors or book titles. But the book's cultural sweep is admirable throughout, its bibliography good.

TL Heath's 1933 report about the Cambridge undergraduate, so struck by Euclid ("a book to be read in bed or on a holiday") may have been exaggerated, making him over into a Young Werther. But Artmann's charming and learned book really is hard to put down, on or off holiday.

[note: this is a lightly revised version of a review I submitted a few days ago. -Malcolm Brown]