Eichmann in Jerusalem (Penguin Classics) und über 1,5 Millionen weitere Bücher verfügbar für Amazon Kindle. Erfahren Sie mehr

Jetzt eintauschen
und EUR 1,35 Gutschein erhalten
Möchten Sie verkaufen? Hier verkaufen
Der Artikel ist in folgender Variante leider nicht verfügbar
Keine Abbildung vorhanden für
Keine Abbildung vorhanden

Beginnen Sie mit dem Lesen von Eichmann in Jerusalem (Penguin Classics) auf Ihrem Kindle in weniger als einer Minute.

Sie haben keinen Kindle? Hier kaufen oder eine gratis Kindle Lese-App herunterladen.

Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil (Classic, 20th-Century, Penguin) [Englisch] [Taschenbuch]

Hannah Arendt
4.6 von 5 Sternen  Alle Rezensionen anzeigen (13 Kundenrezensionen)

Erhältlich bei diesen Anbietern.

Weitere Ausgaben

Amazon-Preis Neu ab Gebraucht ab
Kindle Edition EUR 8,27  
Gebundene Ausgabe --  
Taschenbuch EUR 11,95  
Taschenbuch, 1. Januar 1994 --  
MP3 CD, Audiobook EUR 24,36  
Dieses Buch gibt es in einer neuen Auflage:
Eichmann in Jerusalem (Penguin Classics) Eichmann in Jerusalem (Penguin Classics) 4.6 von 5 Sternen (13)
EUR 11,95
Auf Lager.


1. Januar 1994 Classic, 20th-Century, Penguin
This report on the trial of German Nazi leader Adolf Eichmann first appeared as a series of articles in The New Yorker in 1963. This edition contains further factual material that came to light after the trial, as well as Arendt's postscript commenting on the controversy that arose over her book.

Kunden, die diesen Artikel gekauft haben, kauften auch


  • Taschenbuch: 320 Seiten
  • Verlag: Penguin Classics; Auflage: New edition (1. Januar 1994)
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • ISBN-10: 0140187650
  • ISBN-13: 978-0140187656
  • Größe und/oder Gewicht: 19,6 x 12,7 x 1,8 cm
  • Durchschnittliche Kundenbewertung: 4.6 von 5 Sternen  Alle Rezensionen anzeigen (13 Kundenrezensionen)
  • Amazon Bestseller-Rang: Nr. 450.615 in Fremdsprachige Bücher (Siehe Top 100 in Fremdsprachige Bücher)
  • Komplettes Inhaltsverzeichnis ansehen

Mehr über den Autor

Entdecken Sie Bücher, lesen Sie über Autoren und mehr



While living in Argentina in 1960, Nazi leader Adolf Eichmann was kidnapped and smuggled to Israel where he was put on trial for crimes against humanity. The New Yorker magazine sent Hannah Arendt to cover the trial. While covering the technical aspects of the trial, Arendt also explored the wider themes inherent in the trial, such as the nature of justice, the behavior of the Jewish leadership during the Nazi Régime, and, most controversially, the nature of Evil itself.

Far from being evil incarnate, as the prosecution painted Eichmann, Arendt maintains that he was an average man, a petty bureaucrat interested only in furthering his career, and the evil he did came from the seductive power of the totalitarian state and an unthinking adherence to the Nazi cause. Indeed, Eichmann's only defense during the trial was "I was just following orders."

Arendt's analysis of the seductive nature of evil is a disturbing one. We would like to think that anyone who would perpetrate such horror on the world is different from us, and that such atrocities are rarities in our world. But the history of groups such as the Jews, Kurds, Bosnians, and Native Americans, to name but a few, seems to suggest that such evil is all too commonplace. In revealing Eichmann as the pedestrian little man that he was, Arendt shows us that the veneer of civilization is a thin one indeed.


This report on the trial of German Nazi leader Adolf Eichmann first appeared as a series of articles in "The New Yorker" in 1963. This edition contains further factual material that came to light after the trial, as well as Arendt's postscript commenting on the controversy that arose over her book.

Welche anderen Artikel kaufen Kunden, nachdem sie diesen Artikel angesehen haben?

In diesem Buch (Mehr dazu)
"Beth Hamishpath"-the House of Justice: these words shouted by the court usher at the top of his voice make us jump to our feet as they announce the arrival of the three judges, who, bareheaded, in black robes, walk into the courtroom from a side entrance to take their seats on the highest tier of the raised platform. Lesen Sie die erste Seite
Mehr entdecken
Ausgewählte Seiten ansehen
Buchdeckel | Copyright | Inhaltsverzeichnis | Auszug | Stichwortverzeichnis | Rückseite
Hier reinlesen und suchen:


4.6 von 5 Sternen
4.6 von 5 Sternen
Die hilfreichsten Kundenrezensionen
2 von 2 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
4.0 von 5 Sternen Masterfull interpretation of evil 19. September 2000
Von W J Punt
Hannah Arendt is probable one of the most astute political and moral thinkers of the previous century.
The book approaches Eichmann as a competent but morally vacant burueacrat who sinks into the 'banality of evil' not out of a malicious hatred of the Jews but rather out of a perverted sense of duty and respect for authority. He perverts the Kantian categorical imperative to read - you have the duty to do what society instructs of you - instead of - you have the duty to act in yourself as you would expect society to act towards you. Some reviewers have misread this moral emphasis of Arendt as a defence of Eichmann This is completely false and a basic misunderstanding of her moral argument.
Her brave mentioning of the fact that the Eichmann Trial was probable not in truth a trial but a show to justify retribution as well as the illegality of his kidnapping deserves praise. The fact that Eichmanns council never used this in his defence as well as the fact that technically Eichmann contravened no law in Germany whilst exercising his duties ,gave me the idea that if there was someone in Israel that could saved him from the gallows it would have been Hannah Arendt. Ironic as I have not read a better condemnation of the man from any other author.Then again she also paints the picture of a man making no real effort to avoid his fate but being without the moral fibre to actively seek it out made no effort to hide his identity from anyone. Eichmann wanted to get caught and seeked in his trial and sentence final recognition for his contorted sense of remorse Although the sincerity of his remorse is not doubted it is the nature of his remorse that remains highly questionable. And that is Hannah Arendts exclamation mark behind the banality of this mans' evil.
Her synopsis of the fate of the Jews in various countries during the holocaust is also very valuable to casual students of the Shoah.
War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich?
1 von 1 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
5.0 von 5 Sternen Knowing Eichmann, Punishing Banality 5. Februar 1999
Von D. Check
Eichmann in Jerusalem -- perhaps Arendt's most accessible volume -- is truly a masterwork. In addition to the copius summaries already given I would add several things.
In this book, Arendt, a female Jew and Holocaust survivor, gets inside Adolf Eichmann's head. She begins speaking like him, losing her normally depressed and indignant tone (see Imperialism in _The Origins of Totalitarianism_ for classic examples) for a colder tone, Eichmann's tone, that doesn't feel affected, as one might suspect that it would.
When Eichmann's sentencing comes around, Arendt herself seems to struggle a bit to regain her normal tone and condemn him to death herself. It feels as thought Arendt's empathy has led her to pity this man, rather than hate him. How can you kill someone you pity?
This same dilemma, it seems, arises in her relationship with Heidegger, only she resolves it in the opposite direction.
War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich?
1 von 1 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
4.0 von 5 Sternen The Editor Didn't Do His Entire Job Here... 27. Juni 2002
Von Ein Kunde
Although I found the book informative, well researched, and well-structured, the level of English used was more than a bit disturbing. There is only one reasonable, acceptable excuse - Hannah Arendt wrote it herself in English. However, I am not sure whether that is the case. So, it is important to note, when deciding to purchase this book, that the confusing grammatical structure and word choice is almost comparable to that of "English for Runaways." In addition to taking the time to ponder the contents, most readers will also need to tack on at least an hour, in order to digest the overall language use.
War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich?
5.0 von 5 Sternen More than just a biography 21. April 1998
Von Ein Kunde
Hannah Arendt first wrote this book as a series of articles before she compiled all her materials and published "Eichmann in Jerusalem" in 1963. This book is truly fantastic because it brings the trial, life, times, and death of Adolf Eichmann into light and life. It is truly a work of history which especially sheds light on the startling fact that numerous Jewish councils had helped the Nazis deport the millions that went to their deaths in the killing centers of the East. (Over time, of course, those members of the councils were also deported). It does not attempt to be apologetic and defensive of Eichmann--as the reviews above so claim this to be. It shows his guilt through a recreation of the events--the Wannsee Conference, his relations with Auschwitz kommandant Rudolf Hoess, the deportations from all of Europe, the killing centers...Auschwitz, Sobibor, Bergen-Belsen, Theresienstadt (the latter was in fact a model ghetto but was classified as a concentration camp by the SS and was intended to make the camps look better than they actually were)...Eichmann's life, and finally, his death. Need I go on? I hope that I have proven that this book--one which caused so much trouble among the Jews and Arendt--is for anybody interested in one of the most capturing, magnifying, and horrifying eras in the history of mankind.
War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich?
5.0 von 5 Sternen Blatant Misrepresentation 4. August 1997
Von Ein Kunde
I am astonished by the comments Amazon.com includes under *Eichmann in Jerusalem*: to characterize Arendt's book as a "defense" of Eichmann is either a deliberate falsehood or a comment written by someone who has never read the book. I assume the comment was written on the basis of Michael Musmanno's incompetent review of *Eichmann* for the *New York Times*. Musmanno's review blatantly misrepresented Arendt's work, and I would expect Amazon.com to be able to do better.

Far from "defending" Eichmann, Arendt portrays him as a willing participant in mass murder, and, in her Epilogue, she strongly agrees with the death sentence that he received. The myth of Arendt's "defense" of Eichmann is a result of her belief that Eichmann was motivated more by immersion in the totalitarian "system" of Nazi Germany than by hatred of Jews. In no way does she excuse him or the Germans, and, indeed, she argues that complicity in the Holocaust was ubiquitous in Germany. Her thesis is certainly open to debate, but to suggest that this brave and decent thinker sought for a moment to defend Eichmann or the Nazis is outrageous. Her book remains one of the most thought-provoking studies of the perpetrators of the Holocaust ever written.
War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich?
Möchten Sie weitere Rezensionen zu diesem Artikel anzeigen?
Waren diese Rezensionen hilfreich?   Wir wollen von Ihnen hören.
Die neuesten Kundenrezensionen
3.0 von 5 Sternen Excellent content, but marred by too many flaws in the Kindle version.
Unfortunately, this excellent book was marred by many errors (missing full stops and quotation marks, fragmentary text, etc.) in the Kindle version.
Vor 16 Monaten von RH veröffentlicht
5.0 von 5 Sternen What a mix.
This book contained an incredible mix of philosophy, journalism, sociology and psychology. How many writers would have had the skill, let alone the knowledge to pull off a work... Lesen Sie weiter...
Veröffentlicht am 1. Dezember 1999 von Blake Johnson
5.0 von 5 Sternen True, all too true
Arendt explores the man who superficially seems to be the mastermind of the death of countless Jews and other undesireables. Lesen Sie weiter...
Veröffentlicht am 17. Oktober 1999 von Ricardo Enriquez
5.0 von 5 Sternen Evil just below the surface
I am not sure what the other reviewers below are complaining about. Amazon's review seems a correct and fair assessment of Arendt's depiction of Eichmann. Lesen Sie weiter...
Am 5. Mai 1999 veröffentlicht
5.0 von 5 Sternen A must read for a provoking analysis of morality
I have to agree with the storm of criticism your
reviewer has received. I read Eichman in
order to understand how a civilized society
could descend in barbarism... Lesen Sie weiter...
Veröffentlicht am 13. April 1998 von jschiff139@aol.com
4.0 von 5 Sternen Report on the Ridiculous Trial of a Pathetic Nazi
Arendt provides an in-depth examination of the trial of Adolf Eichmann, and leads one to believe that although he is responsible for the death of millions of jews during World War... Lesen Sie weiter...
Veröffentlicht am 11. Februar 1998 von bakewi00@usfca.edu
5.0 von 5 Sternen Did Amazon.com read the wrong book?
Arendt EXCUSING Eichmann?! That did not occur in the version of this book I read. Shocking misrepresentation by our otherwise gracious host.
Am 6. November 1997 veröffentlicht
5.0 von 5 Sternen The same book... different story ?
Arendt wrote the original version in the mid-sixties, based on her press coverage for the trial. Back then it was a controversial and it took tens of years for WW2 researches to... Lesen Sie weiter...
Veröffentlicht am 13. August 1997 von yaronroz@ix.netcom.com
Kundenrezensionen suchen
Nur in den Rezensionen zu diesem Produkt suchen

Kunden diskutieren

Das Forum zu diesem Produkt
Diskussion Antworten Jüngster Beitrag
Noch keine Diskussionen

Fragen stellen, Meinungen austauschen, Einblicke gewinnen
Neue Diskussion starten
Erster Beitrag:
Eingabe des Log-ins

Kundendiskussionen durchsuchen
Alle Amazon-Diskussionen durchsuchen

Ähnliche Artikel finden

Ihr Kommentar