Using excerpts from Cayce's "readings" the author puts forth Cayce's intersting spin on Jesus and Christianity and provides a lot of detail on Jesus life that aren't found in the Bible. Much of what is in the "readings" is obtuse and unverifyable and it's all strung together in a style that renders it disjointed. Cayce goes into such detail, in some cases giving detailed appearences of various characters involved in Jesus' life that it seems legit and you want to believe him. But ultimately, after reading this book and some other Cayce material on the web, I came away thinking that Cayce's "readings" were just some weird manifestation of an extremely detailed "theory" that he had come up with on his own. For example, at one point we're told that Michael the Archangel actually speaks through Cayce. And yet what Michael says is obtuse and more or less meaningless. Why would Michael the Archangel bother speaking through him if he didn't have something remotely intelligible or meaningful to say? The book exercises your imagination, though.