Der Jahrtausend Mensch - Bericht aus den Werkstätten der neuen Gesellschaft [Unbekannter Einband]

Recently, in theatres in London and New York, carried the dramatic play "Copenhagen," by the British playwright Michael Frayn, revisiting one theme from this now old book. Since translated from it's original German. The play centers around a detail, also in the book; a visit in September 1941 by the then young German physicist Werner Heisenberg to his mentor and dear friend Niels Bohr in Nazi-occupied Denmark. So a detail in a bigger picture, but still a key detail!

The wider subject of Robert Jungk's book is a biographical sketch of the pioneers in nuclear physics, the individual scientist who built the atomic bomb (the time before Hiroshima and Nagasaki), or whose theories were instrumental. The debate about history, nuclear science, and its implications of the reality of the nuclear bomb started after World War II. Back then nuclear scientists worked on both sides of this conflict. Now with hindsight of the Cold War, nuclear proliferation have taken centre stage, but back in 1956 when Robert Jungk's book first appeared, World War II was still casting a big shadow on events and on the debate about nuclear deterrence. In my opinion Robert Jungk's book was one of the first serious attempts at a general account on what was clearly a watershed in history, a series of events that are shaping our lives even today. Since 1956, Robert Jungk's book was reprinted many times, and many more related books appeared.

Jungk's book paints an interesting vivid portrait of such scientists as Robert Oppenheimer, Werner Heisenberg, Niels Bohr, and other leading physicists at the time, and on both sides of that conflict.

What is interesting now is to view Robert Jungk's book in the light of Michael Frayn's play, and especially in light of newly released papers on the Niels Bohr archives in 2002, following the wide attention given to Michael Frayn's version of the 1941 meeting in Copenhagen. The 2002 addition to Niels Bohr's archives is a deposit comprising documents either dictated or written by Niels Bohr referring to what was said at the fateful 1941 meeting.

Michael Frayn's play makes it clear that the two Bohr and Heisenberg were very close both scientifically and personally, and that the 1941 meeting changed all of that. Both men were devastated!

Heisenberg was a leading scientific advisor to the German government in post WWII Europe; and yet he spent the rest of his life attempting to put his spin on his war work; his work on a nuclear bomb for Hitler, or perhaps rather denying these efforts. Niels Bohr who died in 1962 had been extraordinarily tight lipped about his meeting with Heisenberg in 1941. So while the newly released letters supplement and confirm previously published statements of Bohr's recollections of the meeting, especially those of his son, Aage Bohr, this part of the story is not well known, and especially not to Robert Jungk. The letters are from Niels Bohr to Heisenberg, and they are interesting for many reasons, not least of which is that they were never mailed, and so their contents were never known to Heisenbrg. Quoting from one of Bohr's letters to Heisenberg: "--- I think that I owe it to you to tell you that I am greatly amazed to see how much your memory has deceived you in your letter to the author [Robert Jungk] of the book ["Heller als Tausend Sonnen"],---." Review by Palle Jorgensen, July 2006.

Wer sich für die Thematik rund um die Atombome interessiert, erfährt aus diesem Buch viele interessante Einzelheiten über das Leben der Atomforscher vor und nach dem 2. Weltkrieg. Das spannende ist auch, einen Einblick in die damalige Situation zu gewinnen, die Umstände unter denen die Wissenschaftler gelebt und gearbeitet haben.

Das von mir erworbene Buch war in einem guten gebrauchten Zustand. Da sich die "Geschichte" um 1945 abspielt, und somit ein Paar Jahre her ist, fand ich es umso schöner als altes Buch über einen "alten" Sachverhalt zu lesen.

Stellenweise empfand ich das Buch auch als eine Rechtfertigung dafür, warum eine so schreckliche Waffe überhaupt gebaut werden konnte. Aber das ist nur eine persönliche Empfindung, die das Buch nicht schlechter oder weniger interessant machen soll, als es ist. Ein sehr gutes Werk.

Von der Beschreibung fand ich das Buch schon interessant, aber irgendwie war es beim Lesen dann doch sehr langatmig, teilweise sind die einzelnen Passagen doch sehr oberflächlich, es fehlten mir irgendwie die subjektiven 'Storys' der Betreffenden.