2 von 2 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich:
5.0 von 5 Sternen
A fascinating analysis of illusion formation, 10. Oktober 1997
Ernest Becker's Denial of Death explicates the human propensityto create illusions which obfuscate consciousness of the immanence ofdeath and meaninglesnness. Drawing on cultural anthropology, social psychology, and psychoanalysis, Becker explores the human need to ornament reality with illusions and palliative fantasies which protect consciousness from our mortal fear and dread. Becker proposes that death is the "worm at the core" of human self-awareness, and we suffer intense fear and despair at the prospect of our own finitude, mortal decay, and meaninglesness. We therefore resort to character defenses and illusions to blot out our meaninglessness, helplessness, and creatureliness from consciousness.
Becker claims that we could not survive without such illusions, and that we create religion, myth, and ideology to establish a meaningful and dependable universe. Such fictions also provide a fantasy in which we can establish a personal sense of importance and esteem, a feeling of cosmic heroism in an otherwise terrifying universe.
However, whereas human beings functioned historically through the operation of these religious fantasies to evade death and meaninglessness, religion no longer provides a coherent meaning system for many people. Hence, we now create our own fantasies of "the dramatic apotheosis of man." We are now forced to invent our own personal illusions. In other words, where the social fantasy no longer holds, we become neurotics divorced from community and reality. According to Becker, the human animal is the sick animal. Normalcy is neurosis, since we cannot endure reality without anodynous illusions.
In addition, we engage in violent struggle against others to conquer death and weakness. Becker uses the word "sadism" to describe the means we employ to arouse euphoric power over the body and demonstrate control over life itself. By trampling in the guts of others, we achieve a sense of control and mastery which is otherwise absent in an existence where our bodies decay and putrefy, in a universe which can destroy us at any time. Hence sadism can become addictive, and the most vicious atrocities may be committed to attain that euphoric transcendence over death.
Thus Becker concludes that we must make the Kierkegaardian leap to faith if we have any hopes of overcoming our own brutality. Only by opening ourselves up to the very grounds of creation and renouncing our defensive egotism will we be able to shed our character armor and cease destroying each other in the maniacal attempt to overcome death.
Becker's analysis of the psychodynamics motivating illusion is penetrating and imaginative. Through his incorporation of anthropological and psychological theory, Becker provides a vision of broad scope and depth which avoids hasty generalization and the problem of enumerative inductivism. Becker also synthesizes his perspective from ostensibly antithetical sources within psychology. Becker's amalgamation of Freud and Rank is imaginative and of deep importance since both thinkers bequeated brilliant insights. However, such a synthesis has rarely occurred because Freud and Rank have been considered oppositional thinkers, and communications between their respective schools has been understandably infrequent. Through Becker's synthesis, we now have a dynamic understanding of unconscious motivation amalgamated with a more existential perspective that delves into the nature of human meaning.
Perhaps the most crucial problem in Becker's text is his Kierkegaardian solution to the problem of illusion formation. While advocating faith might alleviate a certain amount of human misery, it is questionable whether adherence to another system of meanings equally unamenable to reason or criticism is a sensible solution to a very serious psychological problem. We may be resigned to a certain amount of misery, and throwing ourselves headlong into faith might be an escape of the self, not a genuine solution. Nevertheless, this does not invalidate Becker's central arguments. After reading this book carefully, one must admit that Becker's insights and perspicacity are a tremendous contribution to our self understanding.
Helfen Sie anderen Kunden bei der Suche nach den hilfreichsten Rezensionen
War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich? Ja
Nein
2 von 2 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich:
5.0 von 5 Sternen
A deep and brutally honest treatment, 25. Juli 1997
Von Ein Kunde
All lovers of existentialism will enjoy Becker's treatment of life and death. Becker won the Pulitzer Prize for this work when it was first published in 1974. Ironically and tragically, Becker himself died of cancer that very same year. He was 50 years old. I have been unsuccessful in my efforts to find out whether or not Becker knew of his sickness when he wrote the work. He certainly writes as one who understands the darkness of human life. Becker's thesis is that human personality and behavior has its deepest roots in our denying our death (thus the title). By this he means not only our death itself, but all of the horrors associated with our mortality as human beings. Becker makes frequent reference to Otto Rank, and reiterates Rank's point that all human cultural creation is inevitably religious in nature. There is also a wonderful treatment of Freud which will be especially refreshing to all those nauseauted by modern attempts to dress up Freud's theories and make them appear more optomistic than they are, as well as a discussion of Freud's breaks with Jung and others. There is even a chapter on Kierkegaard. Becker also attempts to show that neurosis is at least in part a result of not being able to erect the 'denial of death' defense mechanisms so many do, and that those who traverse the depths of human existence cannot but go mad to some degree. He says at one point, "No wonder the road of the artist so often detous through the madhouse." Finally, Becker bashes modern psychology, which makes this book an absolute must for any deep thinker who is considering entering this field. The Denial of Death is brutally honest, scholastic, and beautiful. Best of all, Becker doesn't make the all too common mistake of attempting to provide a solution (something all lovers of Camus will appreciate). The last 10 pages alone make this book worth reading. Read it thoughtfully and you will never be quite the same
Helfen Sie anderen Kunden bei der Suche nach den hilfreichsten Rezensionen
War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich? Ja
Nein
1 von 1 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich:
5.0 von 5 Sternen
This book will change the way you look at life., 24. August 1999
Von Ein Kunde
Brilliant, insightful, profound, wonderous, the list could go on and on. This book helped teach me how to think. In analyzing death and the way death is central to all human thought, Becker digs right to the core. It left me awestruck and changed.
Helfen Sie anderen Kunden bei der Suche nach den hilfreichsten Rezensionen
War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich? Ja
Nein
