|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Civilization: The West and the Rest
und über 1 Million weitere Bücher verfügbar für Amazon Kindle .
Erfahren Sie mehr
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 Gutschein erhalten
Tauschen Sie jetzt Civilization: The West and the Rest gegen einen Amazon-Gutschein in Höhe von EUR 4,00 ein - einlösbar für Tausende von Artikeln bei Amazon.de. Entdecken Sie mehr eintauschbare Bücher im Bücher Trade-In Shop. Bitte beachten Sie die Teilnahmebedingungen.
 Jetzt für Amazon Student anmelden und um 20% erhöhten Eintauschwert sichern. |
Wird oft zusammen gekauft
Produktinformation
|
Mehr über den Autor
Entdecken Sie Bücher, lesen Sie über Autoren und mehr
› Besuchen Sie die Seite von Niall Ferguson auf Amazon
› Besuchen Sie die Seite von Niall Ferguson auf Amazon
Produktbeschreibungen
Pressestimmen
Ferguson is the most brilliant British historian of his generation ... he writes with splendid panache (The Times )
One of the world's leading historians (Hamish McRae Independent )
[Praise for The Ascent of Money] Beautifully written... Breathtakingly clever (Martin Van Weyer Sunday Telegraph )
[Praise for The Ascent of Money] The tales he tells of boom and bust, of triumph and disaster, of bubbles that inflate... are the very essence of financial history (Bill Emmott Financial Times )
[Praise for The Ascent of Money] An often enlightening and enjoyable tour through the underside of great events, a lesson in how the most successful great powers have always been underpinned by smart money (Robert Skidelsky New York Review of Books )
One of the world's leading historians (Hamish McRae Independent )
[Praise for The Ascent of Money] Beautifully written... Breathtakingly clever (Martin Van Weyer Sunday Telegraph )
[Praise for The Ascent of Money] The tales he tells of boom and bust, of triumph and disaster, of bubbles that inflate... are the very essence of financial history (Bill Emmott Financial Times )
[Praise for The Ascent of Money] An often enlightening and enjoyable tour through the underside of great events, a lesson in how the most successful great powers have always been underpinned by smart money (Robert Skidelsky New York Review of Books )
Kurzbeschreibung
If in the year 1411 you had been able to circumnavigate the globe, you would have been most impressed by the dazzling civilizations of the Orient. The Forbidden City was under construction in Ming Beijing; in the Near East, the Ottomans were closing in on Constantinople. By contrast, England would have struck you as a miserable backwater ravaged by plague, bad sanitation and incessant war. The other quarrelsome kingdoms of Western Europe - Aragon, Castile, France, Portugal and Scotland - would have seemed little better. As for fifteenth-century North America, it was an anarchic wilderness compared with the realms of the Aztecs and Incas. The idea that the West would come to dominate the Rest for most of the next half millennium would have struck you as wildly fanciful. And yet it happened. What was it about the civilization of Western Europe that allowed it to trump the outwardly superior empires of the Orient? The answer, Niall Ferguson argues, was that the West developed six "killer applications" that the Rest lacked: competition, science, democracy, medicine, consumerism and the work ethic. The key question today is whether or not the West has lost its monopoly on these six things. If so, Ferguson warns, we may be living through the end of Western ascendancy. Civilization takes readers on their own extraordinary journey around the world - from the Grand Canal at Nanjing to the Topkapi Palace in Istanbul; from Machu Picchu in the Andes to Shark Island, Namibia; from the proud towers of Prague to the secret churches of Wenzhou. It is the story of sailboats, missiles, land deeds, vaccines, blue jeans and Chinese Bibles. It is the defining narrative of modern world history.
Welche anderen Artikel kaufen Kunden, nachdem sie diesen Artikel angesehen haben?
In diesem Buch
(Mehr dazu)
Nach einer anderen Ausgabe dieses Buches suchen.
Nach einer anderen Ausgabe dieses Buches suchen.
Ausgewählte Seiten ansehen
Buchdeckel | Copyright | Inhaltsverzeichnis | Auszug | Stichwortverzeichnis | Rückseite
Buchdeckel | Copyright | Inhaltsverzeichnis | Auszug | Stichwortverzeichnis | Rückseite
Vorgeschlagene Tags zu ähnlichen Produkten(Was ist das?)Setzen Sie den ersten relevanten Tag hinzu (ein Schlüsselwort, das mit diesem Produkt in engem Zusammenhang steht).
|
Kundenrezensionen
Die hilfreichsten Kundenrezensionen
11 von 13 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
Format:Taschenbuch
Ein Rezensent hat das Buch gelesen und findet es grottenschlecht. Ein zweiter hat es nicht gelesen, findet aber, der Autor sei ein kluger Mann und könne so schlechte Bücher gar nicht schreiben. Ich habe das Buch gelesen, und finde es nicht toll, aber brauchbar.
Im Grunde handelt es sich um 6 längere Aufsätze, die sich zwar zwischen zwei Buchdeckeln vereint finden, die aber außer dem thematischen Bezug "Grundzüge der westlichen Zivilisation" nicht viel verbindet. Es fehlt in dem Buch die große Linie. Vielleicht ist das von Ferguson auch so gewollt, dass es die Westliche Zivilisation an sich nicht gibt, sondern nur Aspekte, die "im Westen" mehr oder weniger zufällig zusammenfanden, um dessen Erfolg zu bewirken.
Diese 6 Aspekte sind:
1.Competition. = das politische und ökonomische Leben war / wurde dezentralisiert, was es den einzelnen Gruppen und Personen ermöglichte, das hervorzubringen, was wir Nationalstaaten und Kapitalismus nennen. Etwas Vergleichbares gab es weder in China, noch in Indien, wo von oben alles kontrolliert und Initiative erstickt wurde.
2.Wissenschaft. Eine auf Objektivität zielende Methode des kumulativen Wissenserwerbs, der sich nicht zuletzt ganz konkret in militärischer Stärke niederschlug. Vorsprung durch Technik, sozusagen, insbesondere durch militärische Technik.
3. Property rights: Die Herrschaft des Rechts als Basis ziviler Entwicklung. Öffentliche Garantien für Privatbesitz (etwas, woran es z.B. in Russland bis heute mangelt!). Dispute werden friedlich vor einem Gericht verhandelt, nicht nach dem Motto "DAs machen MÄNNER unter sich aus". Nach der wichtigen Maxime "no taxation without representation" waren die Eigentumsrechte die Basis für die Entwicklung hin zu demokratischen Herrschaftsformen. Auch das ist im Westen ziemlich einmalig, und sehr erfolgreich (der Eigentümer als citoyen)
4. Moderne Medizin: dies ist eigentlich eine Unterabteilung zum Thema Wissenschaft. Die Entwicklung von "Medizin" auf der Basis von Magie und Aberglaube hin zu der heute bei uns so verschmähten Schulmedizin führte zu einer längeren Lebenserwartung, und damit auch zu einem rein zahlenmäßigen Vorteil des Westens (auch in den Kolonien).
5. Die Konsumgesellschaft: Der Bürger als Konsument erzeugt erst die NAchfrage nach Gütern, an deren Produktion er dann verdient. Nur so konnte die Industrielle Revolution stattfinden, der wir letztlich unseren geschichtlich einmaligen Wohlstand der MASSEN verdanken.
6. Die "work ethic": darunter versteht der Autor einen ideellen und moralischen Rahmen, der sich u.a. aus dem Protestantismus speist, und der so etwas wie einen "Klebstoff" liefert, um die Dynamik der Gesellschaft zu bündeln.
Diese sechs Erfolgsfaktoren des Westens stellt der Autor ziemlich gut und lebendig dar. Er stellt sie leider auch ziemlich unkritisch dar, so als hätten etwa KOnsumismus und der allgegenwärtige Wettbewerb keine "Nebenwirkungen". Für die Herausfoderungen der Zukunft kennt Ferguson nur einen Rat: Nur ein 100%ges Bekenntnis zur Tradition der sechs genannten Faktoren kann den Niedergang des Westens aufhalten. Denn China wird stark, nicht weil es spezifisch Chinesisches ins Feld führt, sondern weil es den Westen so erfolgreich kopiert. Dass der westliche Lebensstil 500 Jahre toll funktionert hat, aber in seinem Wesen schlicht nicht nachhaltig ist, davon findet sich bei Ferguson kein Wort. Vielleicht gehört die Zukunft ja gerade denen, die "sustainability" als siebten und entscheidenden Faktor umsetzen.
Im Grunde handelt es sich um 6 längere Aufsätze, die sich zwar zwischen zwei Buchdeckeln vereint finden, die aber außer dem thematischen Bezug "Grundzüge der westlichen Zivilisation" nicht viel verbindet. Es fehlt in dem Buch die große Linie. Vielleicht ist das von Ferguson auch so gewollt, dass es die Westliche Zivilisation an sich nicht gibt, sondern nur Aspekte, die "im Westen" mehr oder weniger zufällig zusammenfanden, um dessen Erfolg zu bewirken.
Diese 6 Aspekte sind:
1.Competition. = das politische und ökonomische Leben war / wurde dezentralisiert, was es den einzelnen Gruppen und Personen ermöglichte, das hervorzubringen, was wir Nationalstaaten und Kapitalismus nennen. Etwas Vergleichbares gab es weder in China, noch in Indien, wo von oben alles kontrolliert und Initiative erstickt wurde.
2.Wissenschaft. Eine auf Objektivität zielende Methode des kumulativen Wissenserwerbs, der sich nicht zuletzt ganz konkret in militärischer Stärke niederschlug. Vorsprung durch Technik, sozusagen, insbesondere durch militärische Technik.
3. Property rights: Die Herrschaft des Rechts als Basis ziviler Entwicklung. Öffentliche Garantien für Privatbesitz (etwas, woran es z.B. in Russland bis heute mangelt!). Dispute werden friedlich vor einem Gericht verhandelt, nicht nach dem Motto "DAs machen MÄNNER unter sich aus". Nach der wichtigen Maxime "no taxation without representation" waren die Eigentumsrechte die Basis für die Entwicklung hin zu demokratischen Herrschaftsformen. Auch das ist im Westen ziemlich einmalig, und sehr erfolgreich (der Eigentümer als citoyen)
4. Moderne Medizin: dies ist eigentlich eine Unterabteilung zum Thema Wissenschaft. Die Entwicklung von "Medizin" auf der Basis von Magie und Aberglaube hin zu der heute bei uns so verschmähten Schulmedizin führte zu einer längeren Lebenserwartung, und damit auch zu einem rein zahlenmäßigen Vorteil des Westens (auch in den Kolonien).
5. Die Konsumgesellschaft: Der Bürger als Konsument erzeugt erst die NAchfrage nach Gütern, an deren Produktion er dann verdient. Nur so konnte die Industrielle Revolution stattfinden, der wir letztlich unseren geschichtlich einmaligen Wohlstand der MASSEN verdanken.
6. Die "work ethic": darunter versteht der Autor einen ideellen und moralischen Rahmen, der sich u.a. aus dem Protestantismus speist, und der so etwas wie einen "Klebstoff" liefert, um die Dynamik der Gesellschaft zu bündeln.
Diese sechs Erfolgsfaktoren des Westens stellt der Autor ziemlich gut und lebendig dar. Er stellt sie leider auch ziemlich unkritisch dar, so als hätten etwa KOnsumismus und der allgegenwärtige Wettbewerb keine "Nebenwirkungen". Für die Herausfoderungen der Zukunft kennt Ferguson nur einen Rat: Nur ein 100%ges Bekenntnis zur Tradition der sechs genannten Faktoren kann den Niedergang des Westens aufhalten. Denn China wird stark, nicht weil es spezifisch Chinesisches ins Feld führt, sondern weil es den Westen so erfolgreich kopiert. Dass der westliche Lebensstil 500 Jahre toll funktionert hat, aber in seinem Wesen schlicht nicht nachhaltig ist, davon findet sich bei Ferguson kein Wort. Vielleicht gehört die Zukunft ja gerade denen, die "sustainability" als siebten und entscheidenden Faktor umsetzen.
2 von 2 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
Format:Audio CD|Von Amazon bestätigter Kauf
This book pursues the question, why some "petty former kingdoms" starting at the very end of the Eurasian landmass did come to rule most of the earth and still do so today. Trying to answer this, the author claims that six so-called "killer apps" are responsible for this "divergence": "Science", "Rule of law and Property rights", "Competition", "Work ethic", "Medicine" and the "Consumer Society".
Admittedly, Ferguson exhibits deep knowledge about history, science and politics. He also knows much about foreign countries, their language and culture. Moreover, "Civilization" is read by the author himself and he really lives up to this task. He seems to have worked hard on his pronounciation of foreign languages, even speaking names like "Max Weber" and "Siegmund Freud" in an nearly german sounding voice. Thus, listening to this audio book should be fun, at least for people interested in politics and history.
But - not quite. One major obstacle is the vast amount of numbers which seem to make up nearly half of the book. There is no single argument or statement which Ferguson does not try to back up by some statistics and data, which he not only states once but also repeats, setting them into reference to different years when applicable. It's a pity, because it's unnecessary and unnerving. But if you are a hard listener and are used to numbers (I'm a studied physicist by the way) you still have to follow his strange line of reasoning. This is especially hard since Ferguson jumps from one observation to another. While the poor reader is still thinking about the current argument, the author has already taken up another way of explanation and follows a new, maybe unconnected path. This sounds funny, but it is not when reading this book.
The book's main structure is given by the so-called six killer aps of western civilization. But these parts are much too big to be understood as a whole and should be subdivided by meaningful chapters, which are explained in advance and even make more sense afterwards. But, that's not so. And therefore, the reader has to concentrate and to brace himself for one more sideline of narration which does not seem to make sense.
But, to be fair, Ferguson has some points to make which are really interesting and make the book worthwhile after all. The most important of them is him refuting Huntington ("The clash of civilizations") with the statement that Huntington's predictions just did not come true. Ferguson also says that civilizations do not follow a predefined life cycle but that they are complex systems which follow partly chaotic principles and which thus can collapse in very short time. People interested in questions like these should definitely get this book.
But, there is another thing, which rather occurred to me as a subconscious feeling when I listened to the book. Ferguson seems to be a fan of European Imperialism. He does not outright say so, but he paints the picture of Empire very beautiful indeed. One comes to think that the Africans should be grateful of having been ruled by Europeans. To make matters worse, the author tries hard to appear objective. He does so by not drawing direct clear cut conclusions, but instead jumping to the next argument and giving the reader to think about it alone. But, if you listen carefully it becomes clear that he has his own opinions after all. There are above all the adjective and small side stories which give him away: Why does he describe the destructive consequences of the french revolution and the private life of Engels in that detail, while nearly leaving out the terror of the Nazi regime at all? The author expresses very reactionary views in the disguise of a scientific document. So, be warned - there are interesting conclusions here, but maybe for the wrong reasons.
As additional reading, I recommend the following books: "Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies" by Jared Diamond and "Lob des Imperiums: Der Untergang Roms und die Zukunft des Westens" by Ralph Bollmann.
Admittedly, Ferguson exhibits deep knowledge about history, science and politics. He also knows much about foreign countries, their language and culture. Moreover, "Civilization" is read by the author himself and he really lives up to this task. He seems to have worked hard on his pronounciation of foreign languages, even speaking names like "Max Weber" and "Siegmund Freud" in an nearly german sounding voice. Thus, listening to this audio book should be fun, at least for people interested in politics and history.
But - not quite. One major obstacle is the vast amount of numbers which seem to make up nearly half of the book. There is no single argument or statement which Ferguson does not try to back up by some statistics and data, which he not only states once but also repeats, setting them into reference to different years when applicable. It's a pity, because it's unnecessary and unnerving. But if you are a hard listener and are used to numbers (I'm a studied physicist by the way) you still have to follow his strange line of reasoning. This is especially hard since Ferguson jumps from one observation to another. While the poor reader is still thinking about the current argument, the author has already taken up another way of explanation and follows a new, maybe unconnected path. This sounds funny, but it is not when reading this book.
The book's main structure is given by the so-called six killer aps of western civilization. But these parts are much too big to be understood as a whole and should be subdivided by meaningful chapters, which are explained in advance and even make more sense afterwards. But, that's not so. And therefore, the reader has to concentrate and to brace himself for one more sideline of narration which does not seem to make sense.
But, to be fair, Ferguson has some points to make which are really interesting and make the book worthwhile after all. The most important of them is him refuting Huntington ("The clash of civilizations") with the statement that Huntington's predictions just did not come true. Ferguson also says that civilizations do not follow a predefined life cycle but that they are complex systems which follow partly chaotic principles and which thus can collapse in very short time. People interested in questions like these should definitely get this book.
But, there is another thing, which rather occurred to me as a subconscious feeling when I listened to the book. Ferguson seems to be a fan of European Imperialism. He does not outright say so, but he paints the picture of Empire very beautiful indeed. One comes to think that the Africans should be grateful of having been ruled by Europeans. To make matters worse, the author tries hard to appear objective. He does so by not drawing direct clear cut conclusions, but instead jumping to the next argument and giving the reader to think about it alone. But, if you listen carefully it becomes clear that he has his own opinions after all. There are above all the adjective and small side stories which give him away: Why does he describe the destructive consequences of the french revolution and the private life of Engels in that detail, while nearly leaving out the terror of the Nazi regime at all? The author expresses very reactionary views in the disguise of a scientific document. So, be warned - there are interesting conclusions here, but maybe for the wrong reasons.
As additional reading, I recommend the following books: "Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies" by Jared Diamond and "Lob des Imperiums: Der Untergang Roms und die Zukunft des Westens" by Ralph Bollmann.
Die hilfreichsten Kundenrezensionen auf Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com:
67 Rezensionen
412 von 444 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
Niall Ferguson - The killer "apps" or cultural arrogance; you decide.,
2. März 2011
Format:Gebundene Ausgabe
While I suspect that David Starkey would violently object the two current giants of television history in the UK in terms of providing a worldview are the left leaning Simon Schama and the combative neo conservative Niall Ferguson. Their dust up at last years Hay Literary festival in Wales was a colourful sparring session between two big intellects firing verbal potshots at each other and a joy to behold. Schama concentrated on providing a robust defense of Barack Obama while Ferguson spent much of his allotted time dissing the President's now famous speech delivered in Cairo in 2009. Indeed he has described it as "touchy feely nonsense" and has in recent weeks sent out lurid warnings about Obama's failure to anticipate the demise of Mubarak and to come to terms with what Ferguson sees as the potential rise of the Muslim brotherhood in Egypt and the possible "restoration of the caliphate and the strict application of Sharia". Strong stuff, but Ferguson does like a good row. (see his feud with the nobel prize winning economist Paul Krugman)
These themes above are the heart of this new book "Civilization: The West and the Rest" since Ferguson comes from the controversial standpoint that Western dominance has on the whole been a progressive force and that on the basis of a cost benefit analysis the good outweighs the bad (it is a constant theme in all his books). He recently argued that "the rulers of western Africa prior to the European empires were not running some kind of scout camp. They were engaged in the slave trade. They showed zero sign of developing the country's economic resources....and the counterfactual idea that somehow the indigenous rulers would have been more successful in economic development doesn't have any credibility at all." This is a bold, confrontational, contentious and provocative thesis and his new book reinforces these arguments postulating that there were six killer "apps" which propelled the West to a position of predominance. These were competition, science, property, modern science, consumption and work ethic all with a dedicated chapter in the book.
Space precludes a detailed debate on each theme but for example he contrasts how China was the world's most advanced civilization in the 15th century but stagnated and was overtaken by Dutch mercantilism and the rise of capitalism employing his six "skills". He will equally generate a furious response to the view that scientific development was "by any scientific measure, wholly European". Other ideas that the spread of the market was as influential in the rise of the West as the role of force tends to neglect that the often were inseparable and rather evil twins. Just look at the bloody history of German East Africa prior to the First World War, But even more close to home Ferguson has himself previously recognized in another part of his prodigious output that "When imperial authority was challenged - in India in 1857, in Jamaica in 1831 and 1865, in South Africa in 1899 - the British response was brutal".
That said all Ferguson books, whether you love or hate his arguments, are immensely readable and his historical sweep is vast. There is little doubt that he relishes the big strategic themes and his tone is one of super confidence and often compulsively provocative not least in his view that the West must relearn some of its old tricks to maintain its position. His ability however to take a small example and write it large often leads to accusations of research selectivity and the fact that the successful Chinese business city Wenzou also has 1,400 churches is used to tie some of his "apps" together in what is a very unconvincing argument. The title for this narrative is oddly lifted from another very recent book by the conservative philosopher Roger Scruton albeit the latters theme was Islamic terrorism. Similarly other historians such as Ian Morris, Eric Ringmar and John A Hall have covered these issues with much more subtlety and nuance. Yet Ferguson's strengths are his readability, populism and his headlong assault on some sacred cows. His weaknesses are the employment of the sweeping generalization and a strong streak of cultural arrogance. You can clap loudly or boo vehemently at Niall Ferguson when the television series to accompany this book commences on US television.
These themes above are the heart of this new book "Civilization: The West and the Rest" since Ferguson comes from the controversial standpoint that Western dominance has on the whole been a progressive force and that on the basis of a cost benefit analysis the good outweighs the bad (it is a constant theme in all his books). He recently argued that "the rulers of western Africa prior to the European empires were not running some kind of scout camp. They were engaged in the slave trade. They showed zero sign of developing the country's economic resources....and the counterfactual idea that somehow the indigenous rulers would have been more successful in economic development doesn't have any credibility at all." This is a bold, confrontational, contentious and provocative thesis and his new book reinforces these arguments postulating that there were six killer "apps" which propelled the West to a position of predominance. These were competition, science, property, modern science, consumption and work ethic all with a dedicated chapter in the book.
Space precludes a detailed debate on each theme but for example he contrasts how China was the world's most advanced civilization in the 15th century but stagnated and was overtaken by Dutch mercantilism and the rise of capitalism employing his six "skills". He will equally generate a furious response to the view that scientific development was "by any scientific measure, wholly European". Other ideas that the spread of the market was as influential in the rise of the West as the role of force tends to neglect that the often were inseparable and rather evil twins. Just look at the bloody history of German East Africa prior to the First World War, But even more close to home Ferguson has himself previously recognized in another part of his prodigious output that "When imperial authority was challenged - in India in 1857, in Jamaica in 1831 and 1865, in South Africa in 1899 - the British response was brutal".
That said all Ferguson books, whether you love or hate his arguments, are immensely readable and his historical sweep is vast. There is little doubt that he relishes the big strategic themes and his tone is one of super confidence and often compulsively provocative not least in his view that the West must relearn some of its old tricks to maintain its position. His ability however to take a small example and write it large often leads to accusations of research selectivity and the fact that the successful Chinese business city Wenzou also has 1,400 churches is used to tie some of his "apps" together in what is a very unconvincing argument. The title for this narrative is oddly lifted from another very recent book by the conservative philosopher Roger Scruton albeit the latters theme was Islamic terrorism. Similarly other historians such as Ian Morris, Eric Ringmar and John A Hall have covered these issues with much more subtlety and nuance. Yet Ferguson's strengths are his readability, populism and his headlong assault on some sacred cows. His weaknesses are the employment of the sweeping generalization and a strong streak of cultural arrogance. You can clap loudly or boo vehemently at Niall Ferguson when the television series to accompany this book commences on US television.
170 von 196 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
Masterful, Thought-Provoking and Compulsive Reading
6. März 2011
Format:Gebundene Ausgabe
This book is for anyone who loves history. It is an eloquent defence of our civilisation's values, and also an impassioned and compelling argument for why the study of history is so important and is a vital discipline. It is not a matter of agreeing with every point Professor Ferguson makes, although his arguments are very convincing and it is hard indeed to see how to disagree. This book raises a question, which is how the West has achieved predominance over the rest of the world, and, by extension, how it can possibly maintain that predominance if it loses the features which made it so successful and which are being adopted by its rivals. It is a cultural analysis backed by historical evidence, and it is deliberately provocative even in terms of the question posed, not to mention the answers provided. The main value of this book is not, however, its all-encompassing sweep of world history and rich collation of stories and anecdotes, although that is what makes it so much fun to read and saves it from being boring (which many good books are). Professor Ferguson's virtue is that he does not sacrifice intellectual rigour in order to engage the interest of a non-specialist. As an economist as well as an historian his analysis is underpinned by serious scholarship that is not easily accessible to the layman, yet he vigorously challenges the established conventions that are characterised by complacency, presumed even-handedness, and relativism. Professor Ferguson is magnificent at marshalling a wide range of knowledge to support his opinions. It is what history should be all about. This book is an incisive analysis of the past which aims to stimulate debate. It is a reassessment of our assumptions that have a profound impact on the present, and of course also on the future.
101 von 116 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
Hits the Niall on the head! Pun intended.
17. November 2011
Format:Gebundene Ausgabe|Von Amazon bestätigter Kauf
Wow, what an amazing, exciting and insightful historical analysis of how we all got here! By "here," I mean to say, at Amazon, browsing books on line, reading the reviews of anonymous readers with wildly divergent opinions!
Before I write anything, remember this: Comparative Culture is, by definition, based on human opinion, and its study can be polarizing and emotionally sensitive. This book will get your back up, one way or the other.
There are many detailed reviews already written on this controversial volume, so I'll just cut RIGHT to the chase: If you're a conservative American (or European, for that matter), and you think we are "by God, the strongest country on earth, never been stronger, and all you foreign hordes coming from Asia can love it or leave it!" then this book is NOT for you. If you're a Tea Partier or a Rick Perry supporter, this book is going to rankle you, maybe even offend you, because Dr. Ferguson recognizes that the United States is an empire in serious trouble. But he doesn't leave the story there.
On the other side of the coin, if you're a staunch "declinist," a radical environmentalist, an Occupier, or a gloom-and-doom jeremiah, this book will ALSO put you off. Niall Ferguson is far too sophisticated a social critic to be easily labeled. He's not a flag waving patriot, and he's not a red-hot revolutionary. He's an enormously accomplished historian who believes that our times are BAD, that civilization is dangerously close to rapid disintegration, that the loss of standards and civility in life are creating a world of unimaginable selfishness, that fear and greed rule the WORLD, not just the markets, and that mass consumerism leads to boredom, loneliness and depression. There's just one catch: He believes we can fix it. He believes we NEED to fix it, quickly, URGENTLY!
So who will actually LIKE this book? Political scientists, intellectuals, and liberals with enough time and money to contemplate BIG issues will love this book. Your typical suburban professional, with a mind inquisitive enough to wonder what the hell is going on will love this book. Anyone living in the "West" with the feeling that we're muddling through a decade-long malaise will appreciate this book. Your political persuasion is really not important.
Dr. Ferguson gets our attention by first dispelling the historical misconception that strong empires tend to fade away with time, due to internal stagnation and external competition. Well, he wants us to know that empires don't fade away, they CRUMBLE, usually within a generation. He supports this view with historical evidence. In other words, we live in a world within which many great civilizations have come crashing down due to [the same] internal stagnation and external competition in a matter of a few years. He thinks the "West," and the United States in particular, are dangerously close to falling off the cliff. The Eurozone, too.
He wants to "save" the "West" from this outcome by 1) sounding the alarm and 2) offering recommendations on how this might be done. This is really, REALLY important and amazing stuff.
The book centers around a metaphor of the "West" using its "killer apps" to rapidly advance economically from the "Rest" over the past 500 years. He sets up a beautifully effective structuralist argument that the "West" adopted an "operating system" which became the world standard, and that six "killer apps" were designed for that operating system that completely marginalized the rest of the world. Dr. Ferguson is quite specific about the six "killer apps" around which he constructs his argument. You'll have to read the book to learn what they are! He dedicates a chapter to detailed discussion of each of these killer apps, and explores how the "Rest" are catching up to the "West" because they have simply learned how to download these apps, and make them work within their own "operating system."
The "Rest" adopted an "operating system" that may have been technically superior, but became marginal because it was not pragmatic or expedient. Here, he's referring to the great Asian and African civilizations, and he's stuffing (and generalizing) the comparative political analysis into a "Beta vs. VHS" or "Apple vs. Microsoft" metaphor. I love it!
Here's the punchline: The six killer apps of the West have become corrupted by viruses and are losing there competitive advantage due to COMPLACENCY. We need to refocus on the continued development of our killer apps, and then "reboot" the entire system. We'll become the better performing, restored machine after this, moved back from the brink by own our effort and skill. We'll need to accommodate a new operating system too, because Asia is rapidly advancing.
If we fail to recognize the problem, our killer apps, and our entire operating system may be replaced by another more aggressive and adaptable standard. The world will become one-sided. The metaphor refers here to the emergence of Asia, once again, supported by historical trends. For those of you who rave that Dr. Ferguson's thesis is racist, I offer this: He's not comparing RACE anywhere in the text, but he is comparing CULTURE. Once again, we're talking about comparative culture, which is an extremely sensitive topic. And, if anything, he is praising the enormous advancements of the civilizations OUTSIDE the "West."
I think this is a brilliant thesis, told with powerful insight, strong historical references, and a lovely post-modern allegorical structure.
Niall Ferguson doesn't know everything, but he is smart enough to know when things are bad enough to take notice. And he's optimistic enough in the tools he learned as a "Westerner" to believe that there's much more good work to do. The West is too young to die. Our apps work. They need updates... now.
Will we heed the call to fix things, or will we let stagnant gridlock, selfish intolerance and complacency destroy our civilization? Niall Ferguson believes the choice is ours. WE can work for a better society, or we can continue to go our own way, knocking down anyone and everyone who stands in our way to... what? More debt, more stagnation, and more Lexapro?
This book is, obviously, highly politically charged, and it does NOT respect the decorum we would generally describe as "politically correct." It's an easy read about weighty issues, but it's going to make you either mad as hell or thankful for such a penetrating mind. But if it moves you to action or, at least to contemplation, it's a successful book.
Before I write anything, remember this: Comparative Culture is, by definition, based on human opinion, and its study can be polarizing and emotionally sensitive. This book will get your back up, one way or the other.
There are many detailed reviews already written on this controversial volume, so I'll just cut RIGHT to the chase: If you're a conservative American (or European, for that matter), and you think we are "by God, the strongest country on earth, never been stronger, and all you foreign hordes coming from Asia can love it or leave it!" then this book is NOT for you. If you're a Tea Partier or a Rick Perry supporter, this book is going to rankle you, maybe even offend you, because Dr. Ferguson recognizes that the United States is an empire in serious trouble. But he doesn't leave the story there.
On the other side of the coin, if you're a staunch "declinist," a radical environmentalist, an Occupier, or a gloom-and-doom jeremiah, this book will ALSO put you off. Niall Ferguson is far too sophisticated a social critic to be easily labeled. He's not a flag waving patriot, and he's not a red-hot revolutionary. He's an enormously accomplished historian who believes that our times are BAD, that civilization is dangerously close to rapid disintegration, that the loss of standards and civility in life are creating a world of unimaginable selfishness, that fear and greed rule the WORLD, not just the markets, and that mass consumerism leads to boredom, loneliness and depression. There's just one catch: He believes we can fix it. He believes we NEED to fix it, quickly, URGENTLY!
So who will actually LIKE this book? Political scientists, intellectuals, and liberals with enough time and money to contemplate BIG issues will love this book. Your typical suburban professional, with a mind inquisitive enough to wonder what the hell is going on will love this book. Anyone living in the "West" with the feeling that we're muddling through a decade-long malaise will appreciate this book. Your political persuasion is really not important.
Dr. Ferguson gets our attention by first dispelling the historical misconception that strong empires tend to fade away with time, due to internal stagnation and external competition. Well, he wants us to know that empires don't fade away, they CRUMBLE, usually within a generation. He supports this view with historical evidence. In other words, we live in a world within which many great civilizations have come crashing down due to [the same] internal stagnation and external competition in a matter of a few years. He thinks the "West," and the United States in particular, are dangerously close to falling off the cliff. The Eurozone, too.
He wants to "save" the "West" from this outcome by 1) sounding the alarm and 2) offering recommendations on how this might be done. This is really, REALLY important and amazing stuff.
The book centers around a metaphor of the "West" using its "killer apps" to rapidly advance economically from the "Rest" over the past 500 years. He sets up a beautifully effective structuralist argument that the "West" adopted an "operating system" which became the world standard, and that six "killer apps" were designed for that operating system that completely marginalized the rest of the world. Dr. Ferguson is quite specific about the six "killer apps" around which he constructs his argument. You'll have to read the book to learn what they are! He dedicates a chapter to detailed discussion of each of these killer apps, and explores how the "Rest" are catching up to the "West" because they have simply learned how to download these apps, and make them work within their own "operating system."
The "Rest" adopted an "operating system" that may have been technically superior, but became marginal because it was not pragmatic or expedient. Here, he's referring to the great Asian and African civilizations, and he's stuffing (and generalizing) the comparative political analysis into a "Beta vs. VHS" or "Apple vs. Microsoft" metaphor. I love it!
Here's the punchline: The six killer apps of the West have become corrupted by viruses and are losing there competitive advantage due to COMPLACENCY. We need to refocus on the continued development of our killer apps, and then "reboot" the entire system. We'll become the better performing, restored machine after this, moved back from the brink by own our effort and skill. We'll need to accommodate a new operating system too, because Asia is rapidly advancing.
If we fail to recognize the problem, our killer apps, and our entire operating system may be replaced by another more aggressive and adaptable standard. The world will become one-sided. The metaphor refers here to the emergence of Asia, once again, supported by historical trends. For those of you who rave that Dr. Ferguson's thesis is racist, I offer this: He's not comparing RACE anywhere in the text, but he is comparing CULTURE. Once again, we're talking about comparative culture, which is an extremely sensitive topic. And, if anything, he is praising the enormous advancements of the civilizations OUTSIDE the "West."
I think this is a brilliant thesis, told with powerful insight, strong historical references, and a lovely post-modern allegorical structure.
Niall Ferguson doesn't know everything, but he is smart enough to know when things are bad enough to take notice. And he's optimistic enough in the tools he learned as a "Westerner" to believe that there's much more good work to do. The West is too young to die. Our apps work. They need updates... now.
Will we heed the call to fix things, or will we let stagnant gridlock, selfish intolerance and complacency destroy our civilization? Niall Ferguson believes the choice is ours. WE can work for a better society, or we can continue to go our own way, knocking down anyone and everyone who stands in our way to... what? More debt, more stagnation, and more Lexapro?
This book is, obviously, highly politically charged, and it does NOT respect the decorum we would generally describe as "politically correct." It's an easy read about weighty issues, but it's going to make you either mad as hell or thankful for such a penetrating mind. But if it moves you to action or, at least to contemplation, it's a successful book.
Waren diese Rezensionen hilfreich?
Wir wollen von Ihnen hören.
Kunden diskutieren
|
Das Forum zu diesem Produkt
Fragen stellen, Meinungen austauschen, Einblicke gewinnen Aktive Diskussionen in ähnlichen Foren
Kundendiskussionen durchsuchen
|
Ähnliche Foren
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lieblingslisten
|
|
Ähnliche Artikel finden
Anhand des Sachgebietes nach ähnlichen Produkten suchen:
Ihr Kommentar
Möchten Sie die Produktinformationen aktualisieren oder Feedback zu den Produktabbildungen geben?
|
