Imagine that we are back in the world of 1943, and Hitler saw an opportunity to stop America's ability to supply the Allies with armed forces and material by mining the U.S. coastlines and having U-boats on patrol across from every harbor. Would Hitler take such an opportunity? Sure.
Nations are aggressive about protecting their sovereign interests, even from hypothetical risks . . . such as the possibility that a nation may be harboring a particular terrorist or might have a weapon of mass destruction. That's the interesting premise of Richard Clarke's new novel, Breakpoint.
In 1811, skilled textile workers in England broke into factories and smashed the new looms that allowed unskilled labor to replace them. In 1848, barge workers, bridge masons, and dock workers tore up rail lines all over France to eliminate competition for their jobs and the "English" influence on the nation. In 1942, Japan attacked the United States to break the economic embargo that threatened Japan's ability to compete with the U.S. As you can see there's plenty of precedent for acting violently to deal with economic risks to one's standard of living and aspirations.
In a world where advanced technology is about to take a great leap forward, what might people do to stop that leap? If you mix in technology that might replace humans, could devalue many humans, and create new class differences, you can have an explosive mix.
As this book opens in a fictional 2012, someone is taking down the world's ability to communicate. It's a surgical strike . . . and very effective. As you read these fictional accounts, you'll be chilled to realize that such attacks could easily occur today.
While the big government agencies wallow in routine, the special projects office of the Intelligence Analysis Center contacts key thinkers and quickly discerns the pattern. But can action move fast enough to stop these deadly threats? And who is doing the threatening?
Before the book is over, you'll find almost all of your assumptions about a future war . . . and future terrorism . . . need to be revised. As the Author's Note points out, all of the technology described in the book either exists or is being rapidly developed. This is science fiction about the near, rather than the far, future.
The book is a very entertaining way to learn about these new opportunities and threats to our way of life. Lectures or PowerPoint presentations wouldn't be nearly as much fun.
Ultimately, the author has to be evaluated as a writer . . . and he needs work. The first few pages are taut and interesting. Right after that, the story sinks into a babble of initials, acronyms, and unfamiliar phrases. It was hard to stay focused and follow what was going on. Fortunately, a strong narrative thread emerges again later on. So don't be discouraged if you find parts of the book hard to appreciate. The following sections will eventually sort it all out well enough for you to understand what's going on.
Mr. Clarke has tried to pack a little too much into his story. He has enough plots in here for two-and-a-half novels. If narrowed down into a plot for one novel, it would have been a better story.
But if you are mostly moved by a desire to read the imagination of someone who sees the risk in everything, you'll like this book at about the level of four stars.