My favorite review of this book was by Mary McCarthy, a novelist who had visited both halves of the geopolitically split country now universally known as Vietnam, when American policy was a major reason for considering that country split in two. American interest in the story which Halberstam tells in this book will always be greater than anything that Mary McCarthy might tell us about what any of the Vietnamese thought. For me this book was my first glimpse at the explicit nature of the thinking at the top, which definitely trickled down to the Americans out in the field in Vietnam, though none of them may have used it in the presence of a great American novelist like Mary McCarthy, who possessed an elite, upper-crust quality which made her defense of her own thinking on the topic as easy to dismiss as the superfluous usually are. Like a perverse philosopher viewing the comedy of mayhem, she would like to know "to what end all these excited words were assembled, . . . studded, like a ham, with anecdotes and gossip about historic decisions and high-status personalities, syrupy with compassionate insights into the gamesmanship of power?" That would be like asking why I review books, and particularly, this one.