Being Wrong: Adventures in the Margin of Error und über 1,5 Millionen weitere Bücher verfügbar für Amazon Kindle. Erfahren Sie mehr
  • Statt: EUR 15,58
  • Sie sparen: EUR 0,15 (1%)
  • Alle Preisangaben inkl. MwSt.
Nur noch 4 auf Lager (mehr ist unterwegs).
Verkauf und Versand durch Amazon.
Geschenkverpackung verfügbar.
Menge:1
Being Wrong: Adventures i... ist in Ihrem Einkaufwagen hinzugefügt worden
+ EUR 3,00 Versandkosten
Gebraucht: Gut | Details
Verkauft von MEDIMOPS
Zustand: Gebraucht: Gut
Kommentar: medimops: schnell, sicher und zuverlässig
Ihren Artikel jetzt
eintauschen und
EUR 2,99 Gutschein erhalten.
Möchten Sie verkaufen?
Zur Rückseite klappen Zur Vorderseite klappen
Anhören Wird wiedergegeben... Angehalten   Sie hören eine Probe der Audible-Audioausgabe.
Weitere Informationen
Alle 2 Bilder anzeigen

Being Wrong: Adventures in the Margin of Error (Englisch) Taschenbuch – 4. Januar 2011

3 Kundenrezensionen

Alle 8 Formate und Ausgaben anzeigen Andere Formate und Ausgaben ausblenden
Amazon-Preis Neu ab Gebraucht ab
Kindle Edition
"Bitte wiederholen"
Taschenbuch, 4. Januar 2011
EUR 15,43
EUR 11,17 EUR 8,08
13 neu ab EUR 11,17 5 gebraucht ab EUR 8,08

Hinweise und Aktionen

  • Große Hörbuch-Sommeraktion: Entdecken Sie unsere bunte Auswahl an reduzierten Hörbüchern für den Sommer. Hier klicken.


Wird oft zusammen gekauft

Being Wrong: Adventures in the Margin of Error + Better By Mistake: The Unexpected Benefits of Being Wrong
Preis für beide: EUR 30,45

Die ausgewählten Artikel zusammen kaufen
Jeder kann Kindle Bücher lesen — selbst ohne ein Kindle-Gerät — mit der KOSTENFREIEN Kindle App für Smartphones, Tablets und Computer.



Produktinformation

  • Taschenbuch: 405 Seiten
  • Verlag: Ecco / HarperCollins; Auflage: Reprint (4. Januar 2011)
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • ISBN-10: 0061176052
  • ISBN-13: 978-0061176050
  • Größe und/oder Gewicht: 13,5 x 2,4 x 20,3 cm
  • Durchschnittliche Kundenbewertung: 5.0 von 5 Sternen  Alle Rezensionen anzeigen (3 Kundenrezensionen)
  • Amazon Bestseller-Rang: Nr. 85.365 in Fremdsprachige Bücher (Siehe Top 100 in Fremdsprachige Bücher)

Mehr über den Autor

Entdecken Sie Bücher, lesen Sie über Autoren und mehr

Produktbeschreibungen

Pressestimmen

“A mirthful and wise diagnosis of what ails us: Schulz dances us through science, psychology, and literature in a sparkling history of (and ode to) human error.” (Publishers Weekly)

“[A]n insightful and delightful discussion of the errors of our ways. . . . Schulz remains good company -- a warm, witty and welcome presence. . . . [S]he combines lucid prose with perfect comic timing. . . . Being Wrong is smart and lively.” (New York Times Book Review)

“So, please take this advice: Read BEING WRONG, because it’s the right thing to do.” (Associated Press)

“Kathryn Schulz’s brilliant, spirited, and necessary inquiry into the essential humanity of error will leave you feeling intoxicatingly wrongheaded.” (Tom Vanderbilt, bestselling author of TRAFFIC)

“[A]n unusual examination of the virtue and peril of being wrong and of all the ways we think we know things that just ain’t so.” (Boston Globe)

“Engrossing.... In the spirit of Blink and Predictably Irrational (but with a large helping of erudition)... Schulz writes with such lucidity and wit that her philosophical enquiry becomes a page-turner.” (Publishers Weekly (starred review))

“Kathryn Schulz has given us a brilliant and remarkably upbeat account of the long history of human error. If Being Wrong is this smart and illuminating, I don’t want to be right!” (Steven Johnson, bestselling author of THE GHOST MAP and EVERYTHING BAD IS GOOD FOR YOU)

“Kathryn Schultz is engaging, witty and fascinating as she uses a full arsenal of academic research, colorful stories, philosophical arguments and personal anecdotes to create a riveting account of why we, mostly, have been wrong about being wrong.” (Frans Johansson, author of THE MEDICI EFFECT)

“Both wise and clever, full of fun and surprise...[BEING WRONG] could also be enormously useful—there are very few problems we face...that couldn’t be helpfully addressed if we we were willing to at least entertain the idea that we might not be entirely right.” (Bill McKibben, author of EAARTH: Making a Life on a Tough New Planet)

“A funny and philosophical meditation on why error is mostly a humane, courageous and extremely desirable human trait. [Schulz] flies high in the intellectual skies, leaving beautiful sunlit contrails....It’s lovely to watch this idea warm in Ms. Schulz’s hands.” (Dwight Garner, New York Times)

“Schulz possesses playfulness even as she brings the reader to tears... Being Wrong has a heartbeat.” (Huffington Post)

“Intellectualism made fun! . . . Schulz’s call to embrace flaws and errors as potentially beneficial will surely draw legions of follwers.” (Newsweek)

“Schulz draws on philosophers, neuroscientists, psychoanalysts and bit of common sense in an erudite, playful rumination on error.” (Washington Post)

“An amazing book. . . . I don’t know when I last read a book as stimulating, as thoughtful, and as much fun to read.” (Harold S. Kushner, author of When Bad Things Happen to Good People)

Synopsis

A book that asks - and answers - one of life's most uncomfortable questions: what if I'm wrong? -- Dieser Text bezieht sich auf eine andere Ausgabe: Taschenbuch .

Welche anderen Artikel kaufen Kunden, nachdem sie diesen Artikel angesehen haben?


In diesem Buch

(Mehr dazu)
Ausgewählte Seiten ansehen
Buchdeckel | Copyright | Inhaltsverzeichnis | Auszug | Stichwortverzeichnis | Rückseite
Hier reinlesen und suchen:

Kundenrezensionen

5.0 von 5 Sternen
5 Sterne
3
4 Sterne
0
3 Sterne
0
2 Sterne
0
1 Sterne
0
Alle 3 Kundenrezensionen anzeigen
Sagen Sie Ihre Meinung zu diesem Artikel

Die hilfreichsten Kundenrezensionen

1 von 1 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich Von cfludwig@gmx.net am 15. August 2013
Format: Taschenbuch Verifizierter Kauf
I found this after seeing Kathryn Schulz's TED Talk on the same matter. The book is a bit less funny but no less charming and interesting. Schulz manages to weave scientific and anecdotal "knowledge" together seamlessly and to tell her own tale with a fresh voice! Highly recommendable!
Kommentar War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich? Ja Nein Feedback senden...
Vielen Dank für Ihr Feedback. Wenn diese Rezension unangemessen ist, informieren Sie uns bitte darüber.
Wir konnten Ihre Stimmabgabe leider nicht speichern. Bitte erneut versuchen
Format: Taschenbuch Verifizierter Kauf
Beeing wrong is an eye opening book about the qualities of errors. Why they are happening to everyone and why they still feel humiliating and mortifiying every time. Its not a book about a "righter me in 30 days" rather it tries to convey to its reader that sometimes more errors are better as they bring you closer to the truth that is otherwise unperceiveable. Read this book and you will learn something about the qualities as well as the illusions of beeing right and most likely lose the fear of beeing wrong.
Kommentar War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich? Ja Nein Feedback senden...
Vielen Dank für Ihr Feedback. Wenn diese Rezension unangemessen ist, informieren Sie uns bitte darüber.
Wir konnten Ihre Stimmabgabe leider nicht speichern. Bitte erneut versuchen
Von Piotr Bardzik am 7. April 2013
Format: Kindle Edition
The unsatiable desire to be right and an equally strong desire not to be (or at least appear) wrong, explained in very insightful and uplifting way.
I wii never look at myself or the world around me the same way.
Kommentar War diese Rezension für Sie hilfreich? Ja Nein Feedback senden...
Vielen Dank für Ihr Feedback. Wenn diese Rezension unangemessen ist, informieren Sie uns bitte darüber.
Wir konnten Ihre Stimmabgabe leider nicht speichern. Bitte erneut versuchen

Die hilfreichsten Kundenrezensionen auf Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: 178 Rezensionen
159 von 161 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
A Tour of Why and How We Err (and Why It May Be a Good Thing) 30. März 2010
Von Kevin Currie-Knight - Veröffentlicht auf Amazon.com
Format: Gebundene Ausgabe Vine Kundenrezension eines kostenfreien Produkts ( Was ist das? )
To err, we hear, is human. But if that is true, then why do we take erring so hard? This is the question Kathryn Schultz tries to get at in her book, Being Wrong. The first section analyzes error by recounting what philosophers, psychologists and others have thought about what it is and why it happens. Next, we examines the factors that lead us to err: senses deceive us, reason is easily influenced by extra-rational factors, we trust experts we like instead of those who may be telling the truth, etc. The third section explores what it feels like to be wrong: we may get embarrassed, defensive, heartbroken, mystified, angry. And lastly, the author reveals why it is she believes error should be seen not as a gaffe to be avoided, but a gaffe that should be embraced and accepted as an an inevitable part of being a finite and dynamic human.

First, I must say something I very rarely do about a book: I never once found this one repetitive or unnecessarily long. Each section, and chapter within it, is about a different aspect of error that was not discussed before, from how philosophers conceive of error, to the social factors that influence error, to our amazing capacity to deny even obvious error. And the real-world examples she chooses to illustrate all of these things are humorous, relateble, and sometimes a bit lamentable.

And what is the author's unique theory about erring? The author writes first that erring is an inevitable part of being human. We are finite animals for whom probability is as close as we can come to certainty (even though certainty is what we want). Since life demands that we make decisions based on what we think will happen in the future, it is simply inevitable that some of these will be wrong. That is not and should not be a recipe for skepticism, which is a lazy attempt to fend off error. The author argues that the only way to crack down on error, paradoxically, is to admit its inevitability. Being aware of the mistakes we make that lead to error is the only way to curb it: recognize that fallibility is a part of life (not stupidity), make an effort to 'hear the other side,' phrase your predictions provisionally and treat them as such. The more we realize that error is a human quality that leads to opportunities of growth, the more we can, to some degree or other, embrace it as part of who we are.

And what about if we didn't err? Well, if we didn't err, we couldn't ever change or grow (as change and growth are byproducts of trying to become better and closer to the truth). If we didn't err, then life would be a whole lot more predictable than it is, having good and bad repercussions. If we didn't err, we would never experience surprise or have reason to reflect or think deeply. In short, if we didn't err, we simply wouldn't be anything recognized, for good or worse, as human.

The only complaint I have about this book, as interesting and entertaining as it is, is that the author's "thesis" takes up only about 40 pages in a 340 page book, and comes only at the end. I would like her to have interwoven this point amongst all or many of the chapters, as it is a point which is not only highly interesting and counter-intuitive, but it could have served to really tie the book together.

Other than that, strongly recommended.
208 von 227 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
A crafty - albeit a tad long-winded, preachy - analysis of being human. 3.5 Stars***^* 26. April 2010
Von Paul Stuart - Veröffentlicht auf Amazon.com
Format: Gebundene Ausgabe Vine Kundenrezension eines kostenfreien Produkts ( Was ist das? )
One thing is for certain: Kathryn Schulz is a heckuva' writer. Her brilliant interchange between humor and articulation is the stuff of greatness. Moreover - and perhaps a by-product of Schulz' mastery in presentation - there are few (if any) wasted words in this text. While many books almost goad you into skimming every 2nd or 3rd word, 'Being Wrong' certainly makes every word count. For a guy with the attention span of a billy goat grazing grass, keeping me reading every word is no small feat.

There is a tradeoff in such density in value. 'Being Wrong' tends to see-saw between light analogy to heavy exploration almost without warning, making for a staccato transition between example and execution. The philosophical arguments emerge as bloated at times, the case studies a tad soft and looooong. Word economy clearly has its strengths and weaknesses.

Thus, I echo other reviewers in that this book might've been better served both shorter and as a potential essay. Amen.

Going deeper down the content rabbit hole, it's hard to ignore Schulz' near-frequent lapses into political examples dripping with sarcasm favoring a particular perspective only. Perhaps I'm a stickler, but there something grossly unfit about an advertised objective analysis of 'wrong' justified through political opinion. After the fifth instance of this justification, I admittedly began to question the overarching arguments contained in the book. (I could care less about who you vote/d for; just don't put square peg into round hole to get the point across, ad nauseum.)

A couple hundred pages in, it dawned upon me that Schulz based her thesis - that recognition of wrong is against human norms while a precursor to personal and intellectual growth - on subjective historical application sans any true citation. I loved her first third of the book (the arguments were sound), but then later realized that none of it was based on anything other than Schulz' fit of historical circumstance to her view of the human experience. I again point to her being a fantastic writer; I simply wanted a price tag on that fresh piece of intellectual meat.

Related - and a minor but notable sticking point: I reviewed this book thinking it literally an exploration on 'margin of error,' a social scientific term meant to explain normal error distribution and statistical significance stemming from it. This book is anything but scientific. Just a warning for those looking for a fix in that area.

Please don't flame, 'un-helpful' this review for pointing out these two flaws (political-centric, no 'margin of error') above. I found them important contributions in helping folks determine expectations pre-purchase.

In sum, 'Being Wrong' is a very well written, articulate read...but does so being a tad dense and unsubstantiated and/or preachy argumentatively. I'd give this 3.5 stars if I could.
49 von 51 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
Being wrong is normal! 27. Mai 2010
Von Rob S. - Veröffentlicht auf Amazon.com
Format: Gebundene Ausgabe Vine Kundenrezension eines kostenfreien Produkts ( Was ist das? )
This book caught my eye immediately. Who hasn't been embarrassed to admit being wrong? How often have you witnessed (or been part of) senseless arguments because neither side, once they've become entrenched in their position, are willing to back down or find a middle ground to resolve things?

I originally got this book as I was hoping for answers on how to deal with what I admit to be sometimes irrational behaviour to avoid admitting wrongness. I thought perhaps I'd get some advice on how to approach this sensitive topic with others (particularly in a business setting.) If you're looking for advice on dos and don'ts, some sort of behavioural checklist to overcome this sensation, then that's not what this book is about. (and the author says as much in her introduction.)

In a way though, even without a list of to-dos, the book has helped me feel more at ease about being wrong. Through stories shared of human error, through the exploration of just how our senses work and how our belief systems can fail us, through an examination of how we make decisions and evaluation evidence (and why it makes sense to do it that way), and examples where it actually feels good to be wrong (optical illusions, magic tricks), I started to come to terms on just how being wrong is perfectly "normal" and a part of who we are, and started to move away from the belief that being wrong meant I was sloppy, or stupid, or ignorant. It makes sense that our brains would want to take shortcuts for efficiency sake, and it makes sense that sometimes those shortcuts will be off. Plus looking at how often decisions are being made at the subconscious level underscores how much being fallible is hardwired into our system.

I thought the book was a great read, if nothing else, for the journey it took me through.
17 von 17 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
Enlightening and informative; not an easy read 5. April 2010
Von southernfool - Veröffentlicht auf Amazon.com
Format: Gebundene Ausgabe Vine Kundenrezension eines kostenfreien Produkts ( Was ist das? )
Kathryn Schulz does an excellent job of covering a tricky topic. The foundation for most of her observations comes from great philosophers, thinkers, and psychologists of the past and present, mixed with a healthy dose of classic literature and observations from its authors. This at times made the book a little difficult for me to traverse, but in the end the longer reading time balanced nicely with the thoroughness of the arguments (translation: it was worth the extra work). My biggest joys in reading came from the wide variety of interesting references, experiences, case studies, stories, and anecdotes that the author used to illustrate points throughout the book. I can appreciate the difficulty in researching and applying this information to fit the narrative so nicely.

It could be due to my own misplaced expectations, but I thought the book wandered a little bit... sort of floating around like a boat does when its anchor isn't quite big enough or doesn't catch on the bottom. She does go to great lengths in the beginning to spell out all the things the book is not, but I needed some more direction from her on what she hoped to accomplish. I didn't want to read a long, complex book just for intellectual kicks, so I drafted a rough idea (in my mind) of what I needed to take away from all the information when I finally did reach the end. Overall, this is a thought-provoking work on understanding all the facets of error, and one I comfortably recommend.
13 von 13 Kunden fanden die folgende Rezension hilfreich
Using Error To Become Better Decision Makers 1. Februar 2011
Von James J Abodeely - Veröffentlicht auf Amazon.com
Format: Taschenbuch
Kathryn Schulz's book immediately caught my eye as there are few professions where error plays such a large role as the investment profession. The uncertain nature of markets and the role of probabilities in good investment decision making make understanding how, when, and why we err an essential skill for good money managers. As Schulz points out, "if you want to be right, or improve the odds, you have to start by acknowledging your fallibility, deliberately seeking out your mistakes, and figuring out what caused you to make them." The book, while long-winded in parts, is very well written and well supported.

We often tell ourselves that in order to counter dangerous Herd Behavior, we must "think for ourselves." Independent thought is clearly a worthwhile endeavor, however, it in no way protects us from error. The fact is, we are "profoundly dependent on other people's minds"-- even specialists and experts rely constantly on other people's knowledge-- we (I'm putting myself in this category) are often obliged to take on faith the most basic precepts of our own fields. And as Schulz points out, this both a very good and often very dangerous thing. Imagine having to "relearn" in order to accept as true the most basic concepts of investing or economic theory. We'd never have progress. But at the same time, that assumed knowledge can be source of tremendous error. There are obvious examples from history and science which Schulz profiles, from the Flat Earth Society to the Swiss Anti-suffragist movement to the End-of-The-World-Is-Here Millerites.

Most literature in behavioral finance and the psychology of investing describe why our past errors are hard for us to recall-- our memories are less a factual recording of events and more a perception of the physical and emotional experience. But Schulz takes it to the next level, where not only the fullness of our past mistakes are concealed from us, but our current mistakes remain invisible to us. There is no experience of being wrong, while it is happening, we are oblivious to it-- Schulz gives the fantastic imagery of Wily Coyote hovering above the cliff, legs still running-- there is an experience of realizing that we are wrong.

Schulz points out the actual moment of being wrong is short and transient, thus hard to learn from. Herein lies the value of recording your thoughts, forecasts, predictions (via a blog or journal), etc. not just so you can be on record, but so that record can serve as a learning vehicle, to avoid making mistakes or more positively, to be able to "recycle the knowledge we've gained."

Schulz accurately highlights another area where our cultural norms prevent us from truly recognizing and learning from error, or at the very least, alerting us to possible flaws in our belief system. The disagreement deficit is perhaps the mirror image of relying on the knowledge of others. In as much as we we tend to automatically accept information from people we trust, we tend to automatically reject information from people who are unfamiliar, disagreeable, or confrontational. Perhaps, doing both to our detriment.

The disagreement deficit also has a connection to the dreaded Groupthink-- something that anybody who has ever served on a committee knows all to well. With the prevalence of investment committees making decisions in organizations large and small, there is a growing literature on ways to avoid many of the pitfalls and this book add nicely to that body of work.

Schulz is at her best when she keenly observes "certainty is lethal to two of our most redeeming and humane qualities, imagination and empathy." The chapter on the allure of certainty is particularly compelling. Here she also gives the reader some effective strategies for getting other people to actually listen to and think that what you say might be right-- by introducing doubt from the get go when speaking-- "I could be wrong here, but..." This disarming phrase, actually causes people to listen to you--

Lastly, I particularly benefited from Schulz's discussion of the web of our belief system and what happens when we come to understand something as false that then has far reaching impact on our other beliefs. This study of "how wrong" and which beliefs we must discard and which we can hold onto digs deep.

Surprisingly, after reading the book, I also found myself less invested in "being right" about small petty things that don't really matter. This made for more pleasant interactions will sorts of people from clients to coworkers to family members.

I highly recommend this book to those who are truly interested in digging deeper into how and why we make mistakes and how to effectively use error to become better decision makers and better people.
Waren diese Rezensionen hilfreich? Wir wollen von Ihnen hören.