Whether or not a real relationship inspired this work is not that important. If it is as great as the 'author' says it is, why is the title so obvious about the late author and a famous person that is still alive? The claim is that it is newly discovered but it seems more likely an attempt to cash in on a supposed occurrence. How convenient for the individual that compiled this work that the actual author is dead. Is he waiting for some input, perhaps of the monetary kind, from Justin Hayward? That is laughable. Had this been created from a literary point of view perhaps it would garnish the right kind of attention. This is a blatant misuse of material that could otherwise, in time, perhaps after Hayward's death if he is indeed involved at all, been used to create something with heart. Can it be assumed that this was compiled by Albert Goldman, the vulture author that waited for celebrities to die so he could write 'bad' things about them? Hayward is still alive but the motive is the same. I wouldn't waste my time with this. It will hit People Magazine shortly. It will obviously be bought by people that like dirt. By the way, Albert Goldman is dead and had a reputation for spreading negativity about whomever he chose. It's gossip on the part of the one that compiled it. It's a 'tell all' from a different angle. I wonder if it would have been purchased had the title been different. People will by it because of Hayward's name.